From: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] arm: socfpga: mmc: Enable calibration for drvsel and smpsel
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2015 07:32:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201508200732.35071.marex@denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1440048482.1982.3.camel@clsee-VirtualBox.altera.com>
On Thursday, August 20, 2015 at 07:28:02 AM, Chin Liang See wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 2015-08-19 at 14:36 +0000, marex at denx.de wrote:
> > On Wednesday, August 19, 2015 at 10:21:17 AM, Chin Liang See wrote:
> > > Hi,
> >
> > Hi again,
> >
> > > On Wed, 2015-08-19 at 02:41 +0000, marex at denx.de wrote:
> > > > On Wednesday, August 19, 2015 at 07:54:50 AM, Chin Liang See wrote:
> > > > > Enable SDMMC calibration to determine the best setting for
> > > > > drvsel and smpsel. It will be triggered whenever there is
> > > > > a change of card frequency and bus width. This is to ensure
> > > > > reliable transmission between the controller and the card.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Chin Liang See <clsee@altera.com>
> > > > > Cc: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@opensource.altera.com>
> > > > > Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@denx.de>
> > > > > Cc: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
> > > > > Cc: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
> > > > > Cc: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
> > > > > Cc: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > >
> > > > > drivers/mmc/socfpga_dw_mmc.c | 187
> > > > >
> > > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- 1 files changed, 180
> > > > > insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/socfpga_dw_mmc.c
> > > > > b/drivers/mmc/socfpga_dw_mmc.c index eb69aed..15e537c 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/mmc/socfpga_dw_mmc.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/mmc/socfpga_dw_mmc.c
> > > > > @@ -11,25 +11,140 @@
> > > > >
> > > > > #include <asm/arch/dwmmc.h>
> > > > > #include <asm/arch/clock_manager.h>
> > > > > #include <asm/arch/system_manager.h>
> > > > >
> > > > > +#include "mmc_private.h"
> > > > >
> > > > > static const struct socfpga_clock_manager *clock_manager_base =
> > > > >
> > > > > (void *)SOCFPGA_CLKMGR_ADDRESS;
> > > > >
> > > > > static const struct socfpga_system_manager *system_manager_base =
> > > > >
> > > > > (void *)SOCFPGA_SYSMGR_ADDRESS;
> > > > >
> > > > > -static void socfpga_dwmci_clksel(struct dwmci_host *host)
> > > > > +#define CAL_ROWS 7
> > > > > +#define CAL_COLS 8
> > > > > +
> > > > > +/*
> > > > > + * This function determines the largest rectangle filled with 1's
> > > > > and returns + * the middle. This functon can be optimized, for
> > > > > example using the algorithm + * from
> > > > > http://www.drdobbs.com/database/the-maximal-rectangle-problem/18441
> > > > > 0529 + * It currently takes less than 1ms, while creating the input
> > > > > data takes ~5ms + * so there is not a real need to optimize it. +
> > > > > */
> > > > > +int find_calibration_point(unsigned char
> > > > > cal_results[CAL_ROWS][CAL_COLS], +unsigned int sum, unsigned int *
> > > > > cal_row, unsigned int * cal_col)
> > > > >
> > > > > {
> > > > >
> > > > > - unsigned int drvsel;
> > > > > - unsigned int smplsel;
> > > > > + /* Structure containing a rectangle candidate */
> > > > > + typedef struct
> > > > > + {
> > > > > + unsigned char height;
> > > > > + unsigned char width;
> > > > > + unsigned short area;
> > > > > + } rect_cand_t;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + /* Array with the rectangle candidates */
> > > > > + rect_cand_t rect_cands[CAL_ROWS * CAL_COLS];
> > > > > + unsigned char cr_rect_cand = 0;
> > > > > + unsigned char height, width, k;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + /* No solution if all combinations fail */
> > > > > + if(sum == 0)
> > > > > + return 1;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + /* Simple solution if all combinations pass */
> > > > > + if(sum == (CAL_ROWS * CAL_COLS)) {
> > > > > + *cal_row = (CAL_ROWS - 1) / 2;
> > > > > + *cal_col = (CAL_COLS - 1) / 2;
> > > > > + return 0;
> > > > > + }
> > > > > +
> > > > > + /*
> > > > > + * Create list of all possible sub-rectangles, in descending
area
> > > > > + * order
> > > > > + */
> > > > > + for(height = CAL_ROWS; height >= 1; height--) {
> > > > > + for(width = CAL_COLS; width >= 1 ; width--){
> > > > > + /* Add a new rectangle candidate */
> > > > > + rect_cands[cr_rect_cand].height = height;
> > > > > + rect_cands[cr_rect_cand].width = width;
> > > > > + rect_cands[cr_rect_cand].area = height * width;
> > > > > + cr_rect_cand++;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + /* First candidate it always in the right
position */
> > > > > + if(cr_rect_cand == 1)
> > > > > + continue;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + /*
> > > > > + * Put the candidate in right location to
maintain
> > > > > + * descending order
> > > > > + */
> > > > > + for(k = cr_rect_cand - 1; k > 1; k--){
> > > > > + if(rect_cands[k-1].area <
rect_cands[k].area){
> > > > > + rect_cand_t tmp =
rect_cands[k-1];
> > > > > + rect_cands[k-1] = rect_cands[k];
> > > > > + rect_cands[k] = tmp;
> > > > > + } else
> > > > > + break;
> > > > > + }
> > > > > + }
> > > > > + }
> > > > > +
> > > > > + /* Try to fit the rectangle candidates, in descending area order
> > > > > */ + for(k = 0; k < CAL_ROWS * CAL_COLS; k++) {
> > > > > + unsigned char start_row, start_col;
> > > > > + unsigned rect_width = rect_cands[k].width;
> > > > > + unsigned rect_height = rect_cands[k].height;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + /* Find the row and column where the candidate fits */
> > > > > + for (start_col = 0; start_col < (CAL_COLS - rect_width +
1);
> > > > > + start_col++) {
> > > > > + for (start_row = 0; start_row < (CAL_ROWS -
> > > > > + rect_height + 1); start_row++) {
> > > > > + unsigned ok = 1;
> > > > > + unsigned add_col, add_row;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + /* Determine if the rectangle fits here
*/
> > > > > + for (add_col = 0; (add_col < rect_width)
&& ok;
> > > > > + add_col++) {
> > > > > + for (add_row = 0; add_row <
rect_height;
> > > > > + add_row++) {
> > > > > + if (!cal_results
> > > > > + [start_row+add_row]
[start_col
> > > > > + + add_col]) {
> > > > > + ok = 0;
> > > > > + break;
> > > > > + }
> > > > > + }
> > > > > + }
> > > > > +
> > > > > + /*
> > > > > + * Return 'middle' of rectangle in case
of
> > > > > + * success
> > > > > + */
> > > > > + if (ok) {
> > > > > + if(rect_width > 1)
> > > > > + rect_width--;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + if(rect_height > 1)
> > > > > + rect_height--;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + *cal_row = start_row +
> > > > > + (rect_height / 2);
> > > > > + *cal_col = start_col +
(rect_width / 2);
> > > > > +
> > > > > + return 0;
> > > > > + }
> > > > > + }
> > > > > + }
> > > > > + }
> > > > > +
> > > > > + /* We could not fit any rectangle - return failure */
> > > > > + return 1;
> > > >
> > > > Oh btw. please make sure to use errno.h and standard return codes ;
> > > > -EINVAL in this case I believe.
> > >
> > > Good suggestion, will fix in v2.
> > > Thanks
> >
> > Thanks. I was curious, is this really socfpga specific or can this
> > calibration be used on dwmmc in general -- thus on exynos and rockchip
> > systems -- as well? If it's generic to dwmmc, this should be moved into
> > the dwmmc core code. Also, I am CCing Simon, he's been plumbing in the
> > DWMMC recently.
>
> I am not sure. But definitely we can make the calibration common enough
> if they required the calibration too. Let wait feedback from Simon.
Excellent, thanks!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-20 5:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-19 5:54 [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] arm: socfpga: mmc: Enable calibration for drvsel and smpsel Chin Liang See
2015-08-19 7:26 ` Pavel Machek
2015-08-19 7:34 ` Marek Vasut
2015-08-19 8:30 ` Chin Liang See
2015-08-19 23:23 ` Marek Vasut
2015-08-19 8:33 ` Chin Liang See
2015-08-19 7:40 ` Marek Vasut
2015-08-19 8:21 ` Chin Liang See
2015-08-19 19:36 ` Marek Vasut
2015-08-20 5:28 ` Chin Liang See
2015-08-20 5:32 ` Marek Vasut [this message]
2015-08-20 21:55 ` Dinh Nguyen
2015-08-20 21:59 ` Marek Vasut
2015-08-21 0:33 ` Dinh Nguyen
2015-08-21 0:42 ` Marek Vasut
2015-08-21 20:52 ` Simon Glass
2015-08-24 15:04 ` Chin Liang See
2015-08-25 2:36 ` Jaehoon Chung
2015-08-25 3:08 ` Chin Liang See
2015-08-26 5:29 ` Jaehoon Chung
2015-08-26 5:47 ` Chin Liang See
2015-08-26 6:14 ` Jaehoon Chung
2015-08-26 6:54 ` Chin Liang See
2015-09-01 8:54 ` Chin Liang See
2015-09-01 9:01 ` Marek Vasut
2015-09-01 9:10 ` Chin Liang See
2015-09-01 10:12 ` Jaehoon Chung
2015-09-01 14:53 ` Dinh Nguyen
2015-09-02 10:32 ` Marek Vasut
2015-09-03 0:27 ` Chin Liang See
2015-09-03 5:30 ` Jaehoon Chung
2015-09-03 9:37 ` Marek Vasut
2015-09-03 14:06 ` Chin Liang See
2015-09-03 14:25 ` Marek Vasut
2015-09-04 10:41 ` Pavel Machek
2015-09-07 8:33 ` Jaehoon Chung
2015-09-08 1:32 ` Chin Liang See
2015-09-08 10:56 ` Marek Vasut
[not found] ` <0016CF5815A1B142902817051AF62EB305FDF5BA@PG-ITEXCH01.altera.priv.altera.com>
2015-10-07 2:54 ` Chin Liang See
2015-10-12 14:44 ` Marek Vasut
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201508200732.35071.marex@denx.de \
--to=marex@denx.de \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox