[U-Boot] [PATCH] h2200: Fix build error

[Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>]

On Friday, August 21, 2015 at 07:43:44 AM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
> Hi Marek,
> 
> On Friday 21 August 2015 11:03 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > On Friday, August 21, 2015 at 07:32:04 AM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
> >> Commit <8bfc288c3955> ("usb: gadget: ether: Perform board
> >> initialization from ethernet gadget driver") added board_usb_init
> >> and board_usb_cleanup in ethernet gadget driver. But h2200 board
> >> didn't have board_usb_init and board_usb_cleanup implementations.
> >> 
> >> This introduced the following build errors
> >> +drivers/usb/gadget/built-in.o: In function `usb_eth_halt':
> >> +drivers/usb/gadget/ether.c:2498: undefined reference to
> >> `board_usb_cleanup' +drivers/usb/gadget/built-in.o: In function
> >> `usb_eth_init':
> >> +drivers/usb/gadget/ether.c:2316: undefined reference to
> >> `board_usb_init'
> >> 
> >> Fix it here by adding empty board_usb_init and board_usb_cleanup
> >> functions in h2200.c.
> >> 
> >> Fixes: <8bfc288c3955> ("usb: gadget: ether: Perform board
> >> initialization from ethernet gadget driver")
> >> 
> >> Signed-off-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>
> >> ---
> >> 
> >>  board/h2200/h2200.c |   12 ++++++++++++
> >>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
> >> 
> >> diff --git a/board/h2200/h2200.c b/board/h2200/h2200.c
> >> index 66ae4b6..01f8e67 100644
> >> --- a/board/h2200/h2200.c
> >> +++ b/board/h2200/h2200.c
> >> @@ -59,3 +59,15 @@ int dram_init(void)
> >> 
> >>  	gd->ram_size = CONFIG_SYS_SDRAM_SIZE;
> >>  	return 0;
> >>  
> >>  }
> >> 
> >> +
> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_USB_GADGET_PXA2XX
> >> +int board_usb_init(int index, enum usb_init_type init)
> >> +{
> >> +	return 0;
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +int board_usb_cleanup(int index, enum usb_init_type init)
> >> +{
> >> +	return 0;
> >> +}
> >> +#endif
> > 
> > Shouldn't this go into the PXA2xx UDC driver instead as a set of
> > __weak functions ?
> 
> thought all board_* functions should be added in board files. but
> I think whatever you are telling makes sense. Will post a new version.

Ow, we don't even have a default implementation of these anywhere.
In that case, I think this patch is all right and if noone is opposed,
I'll pick it as is. Sorry for the noise.

Best regards,
Marek Vasut