public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [sunxi][nand][legal]
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 17:15:20 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150824211520.GH25532@bill-the-cat> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87fv388ri4.fsf@turtleware.eu>

On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 08:34:43PM +0200, Daniel Kochma?ski wrote:

> Dear all,
> 
> to my great detriment I've recently noticed, that Sunxi SPL NAND support
> I've been working very hard to upstream has been lately reverted. I was
> surprised, that nobody has acknowledged me about that.
> 
> Namely I'm talking about commit:
> da9971d1b3bdb554d4a4ac948119f8b2616bbcce

For reference:
http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot.git;a=commit;h=da9971d1b3bdb554d4a4ac948119f8b2616bbcce
Which refers to
http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot.git;a=commit;h=f76eba38b3eda905ff3bdc18dd1240d3dcbc6e5a

> I guess it was an act of my dishonest ex-employer, with whom we have now
> legal issue about copyrights on above-mentioned driver. In January 2015
> I was granted with the permission to upstream the code to Das U-Boot
> from my ex-employer and sent set of patches which I hadn't time to work
> with later (note the copyrights on nand driver):
> 
> https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-sunxi at googlegroups.com/msg09354.html
> 
> After this job I have finally had time to finish this work (which is
> based on already published code from January 5th). It didn't took long,
> when Antmicro send me a legal paper with claims that I infract their
> copyrights ? what isn't true. This dispute is still pending on the legal
> ground.
> 
> I have no words for such a meanness from my previous employer ? to give
> permission to upstream code and then, for probably the some business
> reasons, deny their own words. This is really tawdry.

Please, to all sides, don't drag the community into this.  What I want
to note is that in the offending commit from Daniel there is _not_ a
Signed-off-by line from Daniel, and for a non-trivial contribution like
this, that should not have been merged, regardless of the legal status
of the code between Daniel and Antmicro.  No Signed-off-by line on a
large contribution?  Should not be merged, period.

-- 
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20150824/2d37da41/attachment.sig>

      reply	other threads:[~2015-08-24 21:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-08-24 18:34 [U-Boot] [sunxi][nand][legal] Daniel at theia.denx.de
2015-08-24 21:15 ` Tom Rini [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150824211520.GH25532@bill-the-cat \
    --to=trini@konsulko.com \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox