[U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: socfpga: Add support for the Terasic DE-0 Atlas board

Marek Vasut
2015-09-01T15:36:33Z

On Tuesday, September 01, 2015 at 05:12:40 PM, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
> On 09/01/2015 03:33 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > On Tuesday, September 01, 2015 at 09:38:23 AM, Pavel Machek wrote:
> >> On Tue 2015-09-01 00:23:49, Marek Vasut wrote:
> >>> On Monday, August 31, 2015 at 09:57:05 PM,
> >>> dinguyen at opensource.altera.com
> >
> > wrote:
> >>>> From: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@opensource.altera.com>
> >>>>
> >>>> Add support for the Terasic DE0-Nano/Atlas-SoC Kit, which is a
> >>>> CycloneV based board. The board can boot from SD/MMC. Ethernet is a
> >>>> bit different because it has a KSZ9031 PHY, so for now, ethernet
> >>>> doesn't quite work yet, as a few patches are needed to support the
> >>>> PHY.
> >>>
> >>> I thought we did support the KSZ9031 PHY. What's the problem ?
> >>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@opensource.altera.com>
> >>>> ---
> >>>> Hi Marek,
> >>>>
> >>>> This patch is based on your u-boot-socfpga/wip/boards branch.
> >>>
> >>> OK, that makes sense.
> >>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>> Dinh
> >>>> ---
> >>>>
> >>>> arch/arm/dts/Makefile | 1 +
> >>>> arch/arm/dts/socfpga_cyclone5_de0_sockit.dts | 61 +++
> >>>> arch/arm/mach-socfpga/Kconfig | 7 +
> >>>> board/terasic/de0/MAINTAINERS | 5 +
> >>>> board/terasic/de0/Makefile | 9 +
> >>>
> >>> I think it might be clearer to rename it to de0-nano-soc, what do you
> >>> think ? What's the difference between de0-nano-soc and atlas btw ?
> >>
> >> Unless they are going to make "de0-mega".. I'd say "de0" is clean
> >> enough.
> >
> > They already make de0-cv , which is cycloneV SoC based, so de0 is not
> > clear enough, no way. They also make de0-nano , which is cycloneIV based
> > (without soc).
>
> After looking around the site a bit more, I think "de0_nano_sockit" is
> more appropriate?

It's de0-nano-soc, that's what they call it on that website, right ?
SoCkit is a separate board.

Best regards,
Marek Vasut