* [U-Boot] [PATCH] imx: vf610 add function get_cpu_rev @ 2015-09-01 1:40 Peng Fan 2015-09-01 7:28 ` Stefano Babic 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Peng Fan @ 2015-09-01 1:40 UTC (permalink / raw) To: u-boot Since we need to support runtime check for different drivers, we need to add get_cpu_rev for vf610. This patch only introduce a empty implementation to avoid build errors, later more stuff can be added if need to check vf610 cpu types. Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <Peng.Fan@freescale.com> Cc: Stefano Babic <sbabic@denx.de> --- arch/arm/cpu/armv7/vf610/generic.c | 11 +++++++++++ 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/vf610/generic.c b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/vf610/generic.c index 05c401d..bd948cb 100644 --- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/vf610/generic.c +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/vf610/generic.c @@ -266,6 +266,17 @@ void imx_get_mac_from_fuse(int dev_id, unsigned char *mac) } #endif +/* + * Empty function + * Several drivers use runtime check, which needs get_cpu_rev. + * If later we need to do runtime check for vf610, we can add + * more stuff here. + */ +u32 get_cpu_rev(void) +{ + return 0; +} + #if defined(CONFIG_DISPLAY_CPUINFO) static char *get_reset_cause(void) { -- 1.8.4 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCH] imx: vf610 add function get_cpu_rev 2015-09-01 1:40 [U-Boot] [PATCH] imx: vf610 add function get_cpu_rev Peng Fan @ 2015-09-01 7:28 ` Stefano Babic 2015-09-01 6:30 ` Peng Fan 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Stefano Babic @ 2015-09-01 7:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: u-boot Hi Peng, On 01/09/2015 03:40, Peng Fan wrote: > Since we need to support runtime check for different drivers, > we need to add get_cpu_rev for vf610. > > This patch only introduce a empty implementation to avoid build errors, > later more stuff can be added if need to check vf610 cpu types. > > Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <Peng.Fan@freescale.com> > Cc: Stefano Babic <sbabic@denx.de> > --- > arch/arm/cpu/armv7/vf610/generic.c | 11 +++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/vf610/generic.c b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/vf610/generic.c > index 05c401d..bd948cb 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/vf610/generic.c > +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/vf610/generic.c > @@ -266,6 +266,17 @@ void imx_get_mac_from_fuse(int dev_id, unsigned char *mac) > } > #endif > > +/* > + * Empty function > + * Several drivers use runtime check, which needs get_cpu_rev. > + * If later we need to do runtime check for vf610, we can add > + * more stuff here. > + */ > +u32 get_cpu_rev(void) > +{ > + return 0; > +} > + > #if defined(CONFIG_DISPLAY_CPUINFO) > static char *get_reset_cause(void) > { > If there is really no way to get the cpu revision from the SOC, I suggest we use the same approach of MXC_CPU_MX6SOLO with a "dummy" cpu. Something like : #define MXC_CPU_VF610 0xF6 /* dummy CPU */ "F6" from vF610, of course, instead of returning 0. Best regards, Stefano Babic -- ===================================================================== DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: +49-8142-66989-53 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80 Email: sbabic at denx.de ===================================================================== ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCH] imx: vf610 add function get_cpu_rev 2015-09-01 7:28 ` Stefano Babic @ 2015-09-01 6:30 ` Peng Fan 2015-09-01 8:05 ` Stefano Babic 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Peng Fan @ 2015-09-01 6:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: u-boot Hi Stefano, On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 09:28:40AM +0200, Stefano Babic wrote: >Hi Peng, > >On 01/09/2015 03:40, Peng Fan wrote: >> Since we need to support runtime check for different drivers, >> we need to add get_cpu_rev for vf610. >> >> This patch only introduce a empty implementation to avoid build errors, >> later more stuff can be added if need to check vf610 cpu types. >> >> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <Peng.Fan@freescale.com> >> Cc: Stefano Babic <sbabic@denx.de> >> --- >> arch/arm/cpu/armv7/vf610/generic.c | 11 +++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/vf610/generic.c b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/vf610/generic.c >> index 05c401d..bd948cb 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/vf610/generic.c >> +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/vf610/generic.c >> @@ -266,6 +266,17 @@ void imx_get_mac_from_fuse(int dev_id, unsigned char *mac) >> } >> #endif >> >> +/* >> + * Empty function >> + * Several drivers use runtime check, which needs get_cpu_rev. >> + * If later we need to do runtime check for vf610, we can add >> + * more stuff here. >> + */ >> +u32 get_cpu_rev(void) >> +{ >> + return 0; >> +} >> + >> #if defined(CONFIG_DISPLAY_CPUINFO) >> static char *get_reset_cause(void) >> { >> > >If there is really no way to get the cpu revision from the SOC, I >suggest we use the same approach of MXC_CPU_MX6SOLO with a "dummy" cpu. >Something like : > >#define MXC_CPU_VF610 0xF6 /* dummy CPU */ > >"F6" from vF610, of course, instead of returning 0. I not have vf610 board in hand and need to check with others about this. Not sure when I can get the result. So now for quick fix, using your way with your Suggested-by. Later, if I can get the results, can use another patch to fix the cpu type, because build errors should be at high priority to be fixed. What do you think? Regards, Peng. > >Best regards, >Stefano Babic > >-- >===================================================================== >DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk >HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany >Phone: +49-8142-66989-53 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80 Email: sbabic at denx.de >===================================================================== -- ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCH] imx: vf610 add function get_cpu_rev 2015-09-01 6:30 ` Peng Fan @ 2015-09-01 8:05 ` Stefano Babic 0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Stefano Babic @ 2015-09-01 8:05 UTC (permalink / raw) To: u-boot Hi Peng, On 01/09/2015 08:30, Peng Fan wrote: > > I not have vf610 board in hand and need to check with others about this. ok > Not sure when I can get the result. So now for quick fix, using your way with > your Suggested-by. Later, if I can get the results, can use another > patch to fix the cpu type, because build errors should be at high > priority to be fixed. What do you think? Agree - this is the best we can currently do. Regards, Stefano Babic -- ===================================================================== DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: +49-8142-66989-53 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80 Email: sbabic at denx.de ===================================================================== ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-09-01 8:05 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2015-09-01 1:40 [U-Boot] [PATCH] imx: vf610 add function get_cpu_rev Peng Fan 2015-09-01 7:28 ` Stefano Babic 2015-09-01 6:30 ` Peng Fan 2015-09-01 8:05 ` Stefano Babic
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox