[U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: socfpga: Add support for the Terasic DE-0 Atlas board

[Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>]

On Tuesday, September 01, 2015 at 09:38:23 AM, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Tue 2015-09-01 00:23:49, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > On Monday, August 31, 2015 at 09:57:05 PM, dinguyen at opensource.altera.com 
wrote:
> > > From: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@opensource.altera.com>
> > > 
> > > Add support for the Terasic DE0-Nano/Atlas-SoC Kit, which is a CycloneV
> > > based board. The board can boot from SD/MMC. Ethernet is a bit
> > > different because it has a KSZ9031 PHY, so for now, ethernet doesn't
> > > quite work yet, as a few patches are needed to support the PHY.
> > 
> > I thought we did support the KSZ9031 PHY. What's the problem ?
> > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@opensource.altera.com>
> > > ---
> > > Hi Marek,
> > > 
> > > This patch is based on your u-boot-socfpga/wip/boards branch.
> > 
> > OK, that makes sense.
> > 
> > > Thanks,
> > > Dinh
> > > ---
> > > 
> > >  arch/arm/dts/Makefile                        |   1 +
> > >  arch/arm/dts/socfpga_cyclone5_de0_sockit.dts |  61 +++
> > >  arch/arm/mach-socfpga/Kconfig                |   7 +
> > >  board/terasic/de0/MAINTAINERS                |   5 +
> > >  board/terasic/de0/Makefile                   |   9 +
> > 
> > I think it might be clearer to rename it to de0-nano-soc, what do you
> > think ? What's the difference between de0-nano-soc and atlas btw ?
> 
> Unless they are going to make "de0-mega".. I'd say "de0" is clean
> enough.

They already make de0-cv , which is cycloneV SoC based, so de0 is not clear
enough, no way. They also make de0-nano , which is cycloneIV based (without
soc).

> > > diff --git a/configs/socfpga_de0_defconfig
> > > b/configs/socfpga_de0_defconfig
> 
> ...and matches defconfig name

So rename the defconfig.

> > > +++ b/include/configs/socfpga_de0.h
> 
> ...and header file, etc.

And header file.

> > > +/* Extra Environment */
> > > +#define CONFIG_HOSTNAME		socfpga_cyclone5
> > 
> > socfpga_d0_nano_soc might be better ;-)
> 
> socfpga_de0 might be better. No need to have kilometer long hostnames

See above ;-)

Best regards,
Marek Vasut