From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Maxime Ripard Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2015 13:28:41 +0200 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 11/13] sunxi: Add support for android boot image In-Reply-To: <1441098053.2527.1.camel@collins> References: <1441032373-16992-1-git-send-email-maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> <1441032373-16992-12-git-send-email-maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> <1441091338.18644.151.camel@hellion.org.uk> <1441098053.2527.1.camel@collins> Message-ID: <20150901112841.GN29389@lukather> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 11:00:53AM +0200, Paul Kocialkowski wrote: > Le mardi 01 septembre 2015 ? 08:08 +0100, Ian Campbell a ?crit : > > On Mon, 2015-08-31 at 16:46 +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote: > > > When using the fastboot boot command, the image sent to U-Boot will be an > > > Android boot image. If the support is missing, that won't obviously work, > > > so we need it in our configuration. > > > > Dumb question: Is it possible to boot anything _other_ than an android > > boot image via fastboot? > > > > If not then one of the two config options really ought to imply the > > other. > > Well, those options have not been moved to Kconfig yet, but when they > do, there should indeed be such a dependency. > > Otherwise, I believe it still makes sense to have two separate options > because one might want Android boot image support without fastboot. Ah, good point, Android stores its kernel/initrd in that format. So even if you don't want fastboot, you might want the support for the image itself. Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: