From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2015 17:36:33 +0200
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: socfpga: Add support for the Terasic DE-0
	Atlas board
In-Reply-To: <55E5C068.8050904@opensource.altera.com>
References: <1441051025-2287-1-git-send-email-dinguyen@opensource.altera.com>
 <201509011033.35340.marex@denx.de> <55E5C068.8050904@opensource.altera.com>
Message-ID: <201509011736.33747.marex@denx.de>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

On Tuesday, September 01, 2015 at 05:12:40 PM, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
> On 09/01/2015 03:33 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > On Tuesday, September 01, 2015 at 09:38:23 AM, Pavel Machek wrote:
> >> On Tue 2015-09-01 00:23:49, Marek Vasut wrote:
> >>> On Monday, August 31, 2015 at 09:57:05 PM,
> >>> dinguyen at opensource.altera.com
> > 
> > wrote:
> >>>> From: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@opensource.altera.com>
> >>>> 
> >>>> Add support for the Terasic DE0-Nano/Atlas-SoC Kit, which is a
> >>>> CycloneV based board. The board can boot from SD/MMC. Ethernet is a
> >>>> bit different because it has a KSZ9031 PHY, so for now, ethernet
> >>>> doesn't quite work yet, as a few patches are needed to support the
> >>>> PHY.
> >>> 
> >>> I thought we did support the KSZ9031 PHY. What's the problem ?
> >>> 
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@opensource.altera.com>
> >>>> ---
> >>>> Hi Marek,
> >>>> 
> >>>> This patch is based on your u-boot-socfpga/wip/boards branch.
> >>> 
> >>> OK, that makes sense.
> >>> 
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>> Dinh
> >>>> ---
> >>>> 
> >>>>  arch/arm/dts/Makefile                        |   1 +
> >>>>  arch/arm/dts/socfpga_cyclone5_de0_sockit.dts |  61 +++
> >>>>  arch/arm/mach-socfpga/Kconfig                |   7 +
> >>>>  board/terasic/de0/MAINTAINERS                |   5 +
> >>>>  board/terasic/de0/Makefile                   |   9 +
> >>> 
> >>> I think it might be clearer to rename it to de0-nano-soc, what do you
> >>> think ? What's the difference between de0-nano-soc and atlas btw ?
> >> 
> >> Unless they are going to make "de0-mega".. I'd say "de0" is clean
> >> enough.
> > 
> > They already make de0-cv , which is cycloneV SoC based, so de0 is not
> > clear enough, no way. They also make de0-nano , which is cycloneIV based
> > (without soc).
> 
> After looking around the site a bit more, I think "de0_nano_sockit" is
> more appropriate?

It's de0-nano-soc, that's what they call it on that website, right ?
SoCkit is a separate board.

Best regards,
Marek Vasut