[U-Boot] [PATCH 04/13] sparse: Simplify multiple logic

[Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>]

On Sun, Sep 06, 2015 at 03:28:34PM -0400, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 06, 2015 at 01:27:20PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 01:20:38PM -0400, Tom Rini wrote:
> > > On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 04:46:04PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > > 
> > > > To check the alignment of the image blocks to the storage blocks, the
> > > > current code uses a convoluted syntax, while a simple mod also does the
> > > > work.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >  common/aboot.c | 3 +--
> > > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/common/aboot.c b/common/aboot.c
> > > > index 65e633acfcb9..c8556d9b23f4 100644
> > > > --- a/common/aboot.c
> > > > +++ b/common/aboot.c
> > > > @@ -269,8 +269,7 @@ void write_sparse_image(block_dev_desc_t *dev_desc,
> > > >  	}
> > > >  
> > > >  	/* verify sparse_header->blk_sz is an exact multiple of info->blksz */
> > > > -	if (sparse_header->blk_sz !=
> > > > -	    (sparse_header->blk_sz & ~(info->blksz - 1))) {
> > > > +	if (sparse_header->blk_sz % info->blksz) {
> > > 
> > > So, sometimes we have convoluted syntax like this to avoid what ends up
> > > as floating point math on 32bit platforms.
> > 
> > Now that you speak of this, we did have some compilers on some
> > platforms that ended up generating floating point related failures on
> > our branch, but I didn't have the time to look into it.
> > 
> > However, I don't really know how we can end up with floating point
> > math with a mod, is this some optimisations done by gcc?
> 
> My fuzz recollection is that GCC on 32bit ARM when it defaults to a
> hardfloat ABI "knows" that it is "safe" to use the floating point
> registers to do 64bit division rather than shifting and so forth.

Hmm, ok, I see.

> > > Maybe this needs to be one of the helpers in include/linux/math64.h?
> > 
> > Probably then, yes.
> 
> Yeah, this is it.  My first guess is that if you look at
> 9e374e7b729dc9f68be89cd3e3b1d4d48c768ecf you'll find an example that
> matches the problem here and what the right helper/code chagnes are.

I'll look at this and use it then.

Thanks!
Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20150913/96c1e172/attachment.sig>