[U-Boot] [PATCH V2 1/4] drivers: Introduce a simplified remoteproc framework

[Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>]

On 21:46-20150901, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Simon,
   Apologies on a delayed response.

[...]

> > Changes in V2:
> >         - review comments incorporated from v1
> 
> Ah yes, but which ones?!

Hopefully all of them - I'd normally list up the details, but the
changes were a little too many in the case of v2..
[...]

> >
> [snip]
> 
> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

Thanks. Will post next rev fixing the nits and picking up your
reviewed-by tag.

> 
> A few nits below.

Thanks once again for your patience and review.

> > +
> > +/*
> > + * XXX XXX XXX
> > + * *IMPORTANT* NOTE: THE PLATFORM DATA SUPPORT IS NOT MEANT FOR USE WITH NEWER
> > + * PLATFORMS. THIS IS MEANT ONLY FOR LEGACY DEVICES. THIS MODE OF
> > + * INITIALIZATION *WILL* BE EVENTUALLY REMOVED ONCE ALL NECESSARY
> > + * PLATFORMS HAVE MOVED TO DM/FDT.
> > + * XXX XXX XXX
> > + */
> 
> This can be lower case and you should remove the XXXX stuff.

Will do so in the next rev.

> > +/* Accessor */
> > +#define rproc_get_ops(dev) ((struct dm_rproc_ops *)(dev)->driver->ops)
> > +
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_REMOTEPROC
> > +int rproc_init(void);
> > +bool rproc_is_initialized(void);
> > +int rproc_load(int id, ulong addr, ulong size);
> > +int rproc_start(int id);
> > +int rproc_stop(int id);
> > +int rproc_reset(int id);
> > +int rproc_ping(int id);
> > +int rproc_is_running(int id);
> 
> Can you move your function comments to here? This where you define
> your API, and it is the file that people will read.

Will do so as well.

-- 
Regards,
Nishanth Menon