[U-Boot] [PATCH 11/13] arm: zynq: dts: Add U-Boot device tree additions

[Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>]

On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 03:07:54AM +0200, Michal Simek wrote:
> Hi Simon,
> 
> first of all sorry for late reply. I am traveling and I have pretty busy
> time now.
> 
> 2015-09-09 20:07 GMT+02:00 Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>:
[snip]
> > There are Linux-specific properties, so I really don't see the
> > difference. Don't forget that we are using device tree to control our
> > boot loader, so it would be unusual to not see at least some
> > U-Boot-specific properties.
> >
> > My understanding of /chosen is that it is for the OS. But in any case
> > it would still be a binding change, wouldn't it? What makes you think
> > that this scheme would be more acceptable as a binding change?
> >
> 
> I think we should move this discussion to device-tree mailing list.
> I simple just don't think that OS/bootloader property in the device node is
> a good idea.
> Maybe there is better solution but i think adding OS/Bootloader to chosen
> is just better option
> then added this to every node.
> Not sure if sequence matter or not but via one property you can also
> control it.

I think that with ELC-E coming up and that once again there will be a DT
BoF, we (the U-Boot community) need to show up there and in turn see
how many folks we can also get to show up in our mini-summit.  I've
already bugged Pantelis about this a few times.

-- 
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20150919/85fef963/attachment.sig>