[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/4] exynos: Fix passing of errors in exynos_mmc_init()

[Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com>]

Hi Tobias,

> exynos_mmc_init() always returns zero, so for the caller
> it looks like it never fails.
> 
> Correct this by returning the error code of process_nodes().
> For process_nodes() do something similar and return early
> when do_sdhci_init() fails.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tobias Jakobi <tjakobi@math.uni-bielefeld.de>
> ---
>  drivers/mmc/s5p_sdhci.c | 10 ++++++----
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/s5p_sdhci.c b/drivers/mmc/s5p_sdhci.c
> index e9c43a9..bc2102a 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/s5p_sdhci.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/s5p_sdhci.c
> @@ -187,7 +187,11 @@ static int process_nodes(const void *blob, int
> node_list[], int count) printf("%s: failed to decode dev
> %d\n",	__func__, i); return -1;
>  		}
> -		do_sdhci_init(host);
> +
> +		if (do_sdhci_init(host)) {
> +			printf("%s: failed to initialize dev %d\n",
> __func__, i);
> +			return -2;

IMHO, it would be better to write this code as follows:

ret = do_sdhci_init(host);
if (ret) {

	printf();
	return ret;
}
	
In the above code you read the exact return code from do_sdhci_init()
and then you pass it to upper layer.

Returning only -2 is far less informational.

> +		}
>  	}
>  	return 0;
>  }
> @@ -201,8 +205,6 @@ int exynos_mmc_init(const void *blob)
>  			COMPAT_SAMSUNG_EXYNOS_MMC, node_list,
>  			SDHCI_MAX_HOSTS);
>  
> -	process_nodes(blob, node_list, count);
> -
> -	return 0;
> +	return process_nodes(blob, node_list, count);
>  }
>  #endif



-- 
Best regards,

Lukasz Majewski

Samsung R&D Institute Poland (SRPOL) | Linux Platform Group