From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 14:28:47 +0100
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] nios2: use common sequence for reserve_uboot
In-Reply-To: <562F78EC.3070504@wytron.com.tw>
References: <1445916250-19321-1-git-send-email-thomas@wytron.com.tw>
 <201510271007.30298.marex@denx.de> <562F78EC.3070504@wytron.com.tw>
Message-ID: <201510271428.47645.marex@denx.de>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

On Tuesday, October 27, 2015 at 02:15:24 PM, Thomas Chou wrote:
> Hi Marek,

Hi,

> On 10/27/2015 05:07 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > On Tuesday, October 27, 2015 at 04:24:10 AM, Thomas Chou wrote:
> >> Use common sequence for reserve_uboot, as the result is
> >> the same.
> >> 
> >> Signed-off-by: Thomas Chou <thomas@wytron.com.tw>
> > 
> > Shouldn't we just implement relocation properly ?
> 
> This patch is not quite related to relocation. It just says that nios2
> can use the same order (early or late) of init sequence about the
> reserve_uboot() call as most other archs. Only blackfin is special in this.
> 
> I did look into the relocation of nios2 a little. And realized that
> nios2 does not have the relative call instruction like ARM's "bl". It
> will be almost impossible to do relocation without support from
> compiler, eg, emulate the relative call. ><

Ccing Albert, so he can comment on this.

Best regards,
Marek Vasut