From: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 05/21] sf: Make flash->flags use for generic usage
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2015 20:27:34 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151118012734.GA8060@bill-the-cat> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAEUhbmX542mnvMRWOEUmtCk_zpvRqqLFbr-4OkXxGBN3zuQ56Q@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 09:14:01AM +0800, Bin Meng wrote:
> Hi Jagan,
>
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 10:59 AM, Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi Jagan,
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 11:00 PM, Jagan Teki <jteki@openedev.com> wrote:
> >> Use the flash->flags for generic usage, not only for dm-spi-flash,
> >> this will be used for future flag additions.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki <jteki@openedev.com>
> >> [Correct the spi flash flags detect logic]
> >> Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
> >> Tested-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
> >> ---
> >> Changes for v4:
> >> - Fixed SNOR_F_SST_WR
> >> Changes for v3, v2:
> >> - none
> >>
> >
> > It turns out this patch breaks the Intel Crown Bay SPI flash. I
> > compared my original submitted patch with this patch you applied, and
> > surprisingly found there are differences ...
> >
> > My version is http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/517704/
> > You version below seems to modify some places which you thought would
> > be correct, but that's unfortunately wrong. If you reworked my patch,
> > I think you should remove at least my "Tested-by:" tag and ask me to
> > retest.
> >
> > Can you please help me understand what happened? I expected that you
> > should just grab my version and include it in your patch series.
> >
>
> I see you were replying yesterday, but did not see any response on this one.
Modifying patches between the mailing list and applying, outside of
making things apply again or extremely obvious fixes is really really
frowned upon.
--
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20151117/84611084/attachment.sig>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-18 1:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-12 15:00 [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 00/21] sf: Tunning spi-flash layer Jagan Teki
2015-10-12 15:00 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 01/21] spi: zynq_spi: Remove unneeded headers Jagan Teki
2015-10-25 7:32 ` Jagan Teki
2015-10-12 15:00 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 02/21] sf: Return bank_sel, if flash->bank_curr == bank_sel Jagan Teki
2015-10-25 7:33 ` Jagan Teki
2015-10-12 15:00 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 03/21] sf: Add spi_flash_read_bar Jagan Teki
2015-10-25 7:35 ` Jagan Teki
2015-10-12 15:00 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 04/21] sf: Optimize BAR write code Jagan Teki
2015-10-25 7:36 ` Jagan Teki
2015-10-12 15:00 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 05/21] sf: Make flash->flags use for generic usage Jagan Teki
2015-10-25 7:38 ` Jagan Teki
2015-11-16 2:59 ` Bin Meng
2015-11-18 1:14 ` Bin Meng
2015-11-18 1:27 ` Tom Rini [this message]
2015-11-18 6:58 ` Jagan Teki
2015-10-12 15:00 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 06/21] sf: Update status reg check in spi_flash_cmd_wait_ready Jagan Teki
2015-10-25 7:39 ` Jagan Teki
2015-10-12 15:01 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 07/21] sf: Add FSR support to spi_flash_cmd_wait_ready Jagan Teki
2015-10-25 7:40 ` Jagan Teki
2015-10-12 15:01 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 08/21] sf: spi_flash_validate_params => spi_flash_scan Jagan Teki
2015-10-12 15:01 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 09/21] sf: Move spi_flash_scan code to sf_ops Jagan Teki
2015-10-12 15:01 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 10/21] sf: Move the read_id " Jagan Teki
2015-10-12 15:01 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 11/21] sf: Move BAR defined code at once place Jagan Teki
2015-10-12 15:01 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 12/21] sf: Use static for file-scope functions Jagan Teki
2015-10-12 15:01 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 13/21] sf: Fix Makefile Jagan Teki
2015-10-12 15:01 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 14/21] sf: Use simple name for register access functions Jagan Teki
2015-10-12 15:01 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 15/21] sf: Use flash function pointers in dm_spi_flash_ops Jagan Teki
2015-10-12 15:01 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 16/21] sf: Flash power up read-only based on idcode0 Jagan Teki
2015-10-12 15:01 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 17/21] sf: Use static for file-scope functions Jagan Teki
2015-10-12 15:01 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 18/21] sf: Remove unneeded header includes Jagan Teki
2015-10-12 15:01 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 19/21] sf: probe: Use spi_flash_scan in dm-spi-flash Jagan Teki
2015-10-12 15:01 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 20/21] sf: Re-factorize spi_flash_probe_tail code Jagan Teki
2015-10-12 15:01 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 21/21] dm-sf: Re-factorize spi_flash_std_probe code Jagan Teki
2015-10-18 20:27 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 00/21] sf: Tunning spi-flash layer Simon Glass
2015-10-19 9:28 ` Jagan Teki
2015-10-28 18:47 ` Simon Glass
2015-10-28 19:08 ` Jagan Teki
2015-10-29 23:25 ` Simon Glass
2015-10-30 20:02 ` Jagan Teki
2015-10-30 20:30 ` Marek Vasut
2015-10-30 20:33 ` Jagan Teki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151118012734.GA8060@bill-the-cat \
--to=trini@konsulko.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox