From: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/6] usb: dwc2: Handle NAK during CONTROL DATA and STATUS stage
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2015 05:46:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201512130546.42529.marex@denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1449980278-19881-3-git-send-email-stefan.bruens@rwth-aachen.de>
On Sunday, December 13, 2015 at 05:17:54 AM, Stefan Br?ns wrote:
> A function is allowed to return NAKs during the DATA stage to control
> data flow control. NAKs during the STATUS stage signal the function
> is still processing the request.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Br?ns <stefan.bruens@rwth-aachen.de>
> ---
> drivers/usb/host/dwc2.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/dwc2.c b/drivers/usb/host/dwc2.c
> index 5ef6deb..db3acd4 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/host/dwc2.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/host/dwc2.c
> @@ -892,8 +892,8 @@ static int _submit_control_msg(struct dwc2_priv *priv,
> struct usb_device *dev, {
> int devnum = usb_pipedevice(pipe);
> int pid, ret, act_len;
> - /* For CONTROL endpoint pid should start with DATA1 */
> int status_direction;
> + unsigned long timeout;
>
> if (devnum == priv->root_hub_devnum) {
> dev->status = 0;
> @@ -907,26 +907,37 @@ static int _submit_control_msg(struct dwc2_priv
> *priv, struct usb_device *dev, if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> + timeout = get_timer(0) + USB_TIMEOUT_MS(pipe);
> if (buffer) {
> + /* DATA stage */
> pid = DWC2_HC_PID_DATA1;
> - ret = chunk_msg(priv, dev, pipe, &pid, usb_pipein(pipe), buffer,
> - len, false);
> + act_len = 0;
> + do {
> + if (get_timer(0) > timeout) {
> + printf("Timeout during CONTROL DATA stage\n");
> + return -ETIMEDOUT;
> + }
> + ret = chunk_msg(priv, dev, pipe, &pid, usb_pipein(pipe),
> + buffer, len, false);
> + act_len += dev->act_len;
> + buffer += dev->act_len;
> + len -= dev->act_len;
> + } while (len && (ret == -EAGAIN));
I can't say I'm a big fan of these conditions ^ . Can you rework a bit so it's
more obvious what the code does ? The condition in the while (cond) is really
inobvious at a first glance.
> if (ret)
> return ret;
> - act_len = dev->act_len;
> - } /* End of DATA stage */
> - else
> + status_direction = usb_pipeout(pipe);
> + } else {
> + /* No-data CONTROL always ends with an IN transaction */
> + status_direction = 1;
> act_len = 0;
> + }
Otherwise:
Acked-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-13 4:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-13 4:17 [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/6] usb: dwc2: add SPLIT transaction support Stefan Brüns
2015-12-13 4:17 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/6] usb: dwc2: avoid out of bounds access Stefan Brüns
2015-12-13 4:41 ` Marek Vasut
2015-12-16 2:58 ` Stephen Warren
2015-12-16 10:29 ` Marek Vasut
2015-12-17 1:44 ` Stefan Bruens
2015-12-13 4:17 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/6] usb: dwc2: Handle NAK during CONTROL DATA and STATUS stage Stefan Brüns
2015-12-13 4:46 ` Marek Vasut [this message]
2015-12-16 3:07 ` Stephen Warren
2015-12-17 3:09 ` Stefan Bruens
2015-12-13 4:17 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/6] usb: dwc2: determine TT hub address and port for split transactions Stefan Brüns
2015-12-13 4:43 ` Marek Vasut
2015-12-16 3:17 ` Stephen Warren
2015-12-17 3:16 ` Stefan Bruens
2015-12-18 1:11 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH] usb: Move determination of TT hub address/port into seperate function Stefan Brüns
2015-12-18 2:35 ` Marek Vasut
2015-12-18 10:00 ` Hans de Goede
2015-12-19 17:17 ` Stefan Bruens
2015-12-19 18:27 ` Hans de Goede
2015-12-19 20:16 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2 v2] " Stefan Brüns
2015-12-19 20:16 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2 v2] usb: musb: Fix hub port number for SPLIT transactions Stefan Brüns
2015-12-21 19:33 ` Hans de Goede
2015-12-21 20:27 ` Marek Vasut
2015-12-21 23:02 ` Stefan Bruens
2015-12-21 23:08 ` Marek Vasut
2015-12-19 20:26 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2 v3] usb: Move determination of TT hub address/port into seperate function Stefan Brüns
2015-12-20 19:12 ` Hans de Goede
2015-12-21 19:32 ` Hans de Goede
2015-12-13 4:17 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/6] usb: dwc2: add helper function for setting SPLIT HC registers Stefan Brüns
2015-12-13 4:44 ` Marek Vasut
2015-12-16 3:19 ` Stephen Warren
2015-12-13 4:17 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 5/6] usb: dwc2: add support for SPLIT transactions Stefan Brüns
2015-12-13 4:48 ` Marek Vasut
2015-12-16 3:36 ` Stephen Warren
2015-12-20 0:17 ` Stefan Bruens
2015-12-20 0:41 ` Marek Vasut
2015-12-13 4:17 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 6/6] usb: dwc2: remove no longer used wait_for_chhltd() Stefan Brüns
2015-12-13 4:48 ` Marek Vasut
2015-12-16 3:36 ` Stephen Warren
2015-12-13 4:41 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/6] usb: dwc2: add SPLIT transaction support Marek Vasut
2015-12-16 2:53 ` Stephen Warren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201512130546.42529.marex@denx.de \
--to=marex@denx.de \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox