public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/5] altera_qspi: show erase progress
Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2015 05:08:27 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201512250508.27137.marex@denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <567C89EC.1000502@wytron.com.tw>

On Friday, December 25, 2015 at 01:12:28 AM, Thomas Chou wrote:
> Hi Marek,
> 
> On 2015?12?24? 13:37, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > On Thursday, December 24, 2015 at 06:24:45 AM, Thomas Chou wrote:
> >> Hi Marek,
> >> 
> >> On 2015?12?24? 11:42, Marek Vasut wrote:
> >>> On Thursday, December 24, 2015 at 04:26:57 AM, Thomas Chou wrote:
> >>>> Hi Marek,
> >>> 
> >>> Hi Thomas,
> >>> 
> >>>> On 2015?12?24? 11:02, Marek Vasut wrote:
> >>>>> On Thursday, December 24, 2015 at 03:50:57 AM, Thomas Chou wrote:
> >>>>>> Hi Marek,
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> On 2015?12?24? 09:29, Marek Vasut wrote:
> >>>>>>> On Thursday, December 24, 2015 at 01:51:23 AM, Thomas Chou wrote:
> >>>>>>>> Show sector erase progress with dot and comma.
> >>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Chou <thomas@wytron.com.tw>
> >>>>>>>> ---
> >>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>> Shouldn't this go into common code ?
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> The code to print a dot is minimal. It will cost more if this go
> >>>>>> into common code.
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> But then this driver behaves in a non-standard manner AND noone
> >>>>> benefits from this functionality but this driver.
> >>>> 
> >>>> The sector erase might take very long when there are a lot of sectors
> >>>> to erase, say 12 min to 50 min for 1024 sectors on the 10m50 board.
> >>>> Without the display of progress, it will look like the board hangs.
> >>> 
> >>> Yeah, that I do understand and I agree this is a good idea :)
> >>> 
> >>>> The dotting code comes from the old cfi_flash.c. Some other parallel
> >>>> flash have this, but not spi-flash. It is trivial to add though.
> >>> 
> >>> Urm, altera_qspi is CFI, right ? So can we stuff this into common code
> >>> or not? Sorry if I am confused and off the mark.
> >> 
> >> No worries. I think the dotting is best done per driver.
> > 
> > Well why do you think so ?
> 
> Well, it is only a putc() which is plain and simple.

Sure, but then I still don't understand why this cannot be in the common code.

Best regards,
Marek Vasut

  reply	other threads:[~2015-12-25  4:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-12-24  0:51 [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/5] altera_qspi: call callback even if the erase failed Thomas Chou
2015-12-24  0:51 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/5] altera_qspi: set fail_addr for erase ops Thomas Chou
2015-12-28  1:34   ` Thomas Chou
2015-12-24  0:51 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/5] altera_qspi: skip erase if the sector is blank Thomas Chou
2015-12-24  1:28   ` Marek Vasut
2015-12-24  2:23     ` Thomas Chou
2015-12-24  3:01       ` Marek Vasut
2015-12-24  3:08         ` Thomas Chou
2015-12-24  3:43           ` Marek Vasut
2015-12-28  1:34   ` Thomas Chou
2015-12-24  0:51 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/5] altera_qspi: show erase progress Thomas Chou
2015-12-24  1:29   ` Marek Vasut
2015-12-24  2:50     ` Thomas Chou
2015-12-24  3:02       ` Marek Vasut
2015-12-24  3:26         ` Thomas Chou
2015-12-24  3:42           ` Marek Vasut
2015-12-24  5:24             ` Thomas Chou
2015-12-24  5:37               ` Marek Vasut
2015-12-25  0:12                 ` Thomas Chou
2015-12-25  4:08                   ` Marek Vasut [this message]
2015-12-25  8:33                     ` Thomas Chou
2015-12-25  9:58                       ` Marek Vasut
2015-12-28  1:17                         ` Thomas Chou
2015-12-28  5:35                           ` Marek Vasut
2015-12-28  8:04                             ` Thomas Chou
2015-12-28 12:40                               ` Marek Vasut
2015-12-28  1:35   ` Thomas Chou
2015-12-24  0:51 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 5/5] altera_qspi: allow ctrl-c to abort the erase ops Thomas Chou
2015-12-28  1:35   ` Thomas Chou
2015-12-28  1:34 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/5] altera_qspi: call callback even if the erase failed Thomas Chou

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201512250508.27137.marex@denx.de \
    --to=marex@denx.de \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox