From: Albert ARIBAUD <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] arm: Replace test for CONFIG_ARMV7 with CONFIG_CPU_V7
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2015 23:18:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151230231837.5dbdab78@lilith> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1451414642-21289-1-git-send-email-marex@denx.de>
Hello Marek,
On Tue, 29 Dec 2015 19:44:01 +0100, Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de> wrote:
> The arch/arm/lib/cache-cp15.c checks for CONFIG_ARMV7 and if this macro is
> set, it configures TTBR0 register. This register must be configured for the
> cache on ARMv7 to operate correctly.
>
> The problem is that noone actually sets the CONFIG_ARMV7 macro and thus the
> TTBR0 is not configured at all. On SoCFPGA, this produces all sorts of minor
> issues which are hard to replicate, for example certain USB sticks are not
> detected or QSPI NOR sometimes fails to write pages completely.
>
> The solution is to replace CONFIG_ARMV7 test with CONFIG_CPU_V7 one. This is
> correct because the code which added the test(s) for CONFIG_ARMV7 was added
> shortly after CONFIG_ARMV7 was replaced by CONFIG_CPU_V7 and this code was
> not adjusted correctly to reflect that change.
Analysis of the series shows that:
- it does not change the values of DCACHE_OFF, DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH and
DCACHE_WRITEBACK;
- it does change the value of DCACHE_WRITEALLOC from 0x16 to 0x101E, but
DCACHE_WRITEALLOC is only used when CONFIG_SYS_ARM_CACHE_WRITEALLOC is
defined, which does not happen throughout U-Boot, as shown by a search
for "WRITEALLOC".
- it sets inner and outer region cache control bits in TTBR0, to match
the cacheability of the DDR in which the MMU table resides.
Marek performed tests of patch 1/2 only (with the S bit set) and of
the whole series (wih the S bit clear). With patch 1/2 only, Marek could
witness the performance hit described by Stefan Roese; with the whole
series, Marek saw no performance hit any more.
I will therefore take this patch series in, since it fixes an obvious
issue in the U-Boot code and does not show any adverse effect.
Amicalement,
--
Albert.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-30 22:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-29 18:44 [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] arm: Replace test for CONFIG_ARMV7 with CONFIG_CPU_V7 Marek Vasut
2015-12-29 18:44 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] arm: Remove S bit from MMU section entry Marek Vasut
2015-12-30 22:18 ` Albert ARIBAUD [this message]
2016-01-29 16:22 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] arm: Replace test for CONFIG_ARMV7 with CONFIG_CPU_V7 Albert ARIBAUD
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151230231837.5dbdab78@lilith \
--to=albert.u.boot@aribaud.net \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox