From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bryan Hundven Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 10:38:17 -0800 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] powerpc: p1_p2_rdb_pc: rename to P2020RDB_PC In-Reply-To: <568BF6DD.9030403@freescale.com> References: <1450498592-22331-1-git-send-email-bryanhundven@gmail.com> <568BF6DD.9030403@freescale.com> Message-ID: <20160105183817.GA3256@hp2000d> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 09:01:17AM -0800, York Sun wrote: > > > On 12/23/2015 07:40 AM, Bryan Hundven wrote: > > York, > > > > Just checking if you had seen this patch? > > > > Yes, I noticed. You rename P2020RDB to P2020RDB_PC. Do you have another patch > using P2020RDB? It may be irrelevant. I have a p1020rdb-pb. So technically, unless we want to support p2020rdb-pb (which I don't have, and cannot test), you can ignore this one. I have work here: https://github.com/bhundven/u-boot/tree/p1_p2_rdb-wip where I have reverted removing the p1_p2_rdb board, but have started to clean up the difference between p1_p2_rdb and p1_p2_rdb_pc. Eventually, it makes sense to me to move p1_p2_rdb_pc to p1_p2_rdb, as it has pc, and pd. If I can get time to finish, it would have p1020rdb-pb. Then just add the small difference for p1011rdb/p1020rdb-pb. What are your opinions on that? The things that are difficult right now are: * ddr(2) does not use spd on pb? * I have the ltib cds that came with the board, but I still feel like I'm missing a reference manual that is for the pb version. I can find the pc and pd versions of the 1020RM online. pb just seems a little different. -Bryan -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 473 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: