From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marek Vasut Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 03:17:00 +0100 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/4 v4] spi: Add Cadence QSPI DM driver used by SoCFPGA In-Reply-To: <54855DE5.3050000@denx.de> References: <1415360272-13249-1-git-send-email-sr@denx.de> <201412061356.52610.marex@denx.de> <54855DE5.3050000@denx.de> Message-ID: <201601140317.00862.marex@denx.de> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On Monday, December 08, 2014 at 09:14:29 AM, Stefan Roese wrote: > On 06.12.2014 13:56, Marek Vasut wrote: > > On Saturday, November 08, 2014 at 01:18:31 PM, Stefan Roese wrote: > >> On 07.11.2014 20:56, Dinh Nguyen wrote: > >>> +CC: Graham Moore > >>> > >>> On 11/07/2014 09:26 AM, Stefan Roese wrote: > >>>> Hi Dinh, Hi Vince! > >> > >> > >> > >>>> Could we not just use a "plain" GPL (v2) license here as well. > >>>> Especially since the other files in this driver are just normal GPL > >>>> files. > >>>> > >>>> Comments welcome. > >>> > >>> Graham recent posted to lkml a patch series for QSPI that has a plain > >>> GPLv2. > >>> > >>> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=141417788514196&w=2 > >> > >> Interesting. Thanks for this info. But what is the implication of this > >> new plain GPLv2'ed driver code to the current code in this patch (based > >> on your Rocketboard.org version)? > >> > >> Frankly, I really don't have time and motivation to re-port this new > >> Linux version to U-Boot to get the GPLv2 version. How could we solve > >> this? Can you re-release this code under this new license (header)? > > > > Hi, > > > > I have this one still marked as "Open Issue", any news here ? > > Not from my side I'm afraid. Perhaps somebody from Altera (Dinh, > Graham?) could chime in and let us know, if it would be possible to > license the current QSPI file under GPL? Is anyone planning to take up the task of porting the V10 of the QSPI driver into U-Boot to replace the current horror ? ;-) Best regards, Marek Vasut