From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 15:47:40 -0500
Subject: [U-Boot] is it worth enhancing cmd_immap.c to handle 83xx?
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.20.1512220611020.14374@localhost>
References: <alpine.LFD.2.20.1512220611020.14374@localhost>
Message-ID: <20160114204740.GX3359@bill-the-cat>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 06:13:45AM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:

>   as i'm currently messing with MPC8360e-based board, is there any
> value in submitting a patch so that cmd_immap.c can handle 83xx? it
> seems pretty straightforward. i'm also working on the politics of
> being allowed to submit a patch to deal with an MPC8360e-based system
> currently being ported to linux so that that cmd_immap.c enhancement
> would have actual value.

If you're able to mainline other useful things with MPC83xx yes,
otherwise, probably not.

-- 
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20160114/7eb47e7d/attachment.sig>