[U-Boot] buildman errors

Marek Vasut
2016-01-25T03:01:00Z

On Monday, January 25, 2016 at 03:58:38 AM, Bin Meng wrote:
> Hi Marek,
>
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 10:52 AM, Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de> wrote:
> > On Monday, January 25, 2016 at 03:45:25 AM, Bin Meng wrote:
> >> On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 10:42 AM, Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 1:01 AM, Stefano Babic <sbabic@denx.de> wrote:
> >> >> On 24/01/2016 17:41, Marek Vasut wrote:
> >> >>> On Sunday, January 24, 2016 at 05:19:54 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> >> >>>> On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 12:00:42PM +0800, Bin Meng wrote:
> >> >>>>> Hi,
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> Summary of 71 commits for 1100 boards (24 threads, 1 job per
> >> >>>>> thread) 01: iocon / bamboo: Drop CONFIG_SYS_LONGHELP
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> blackfin: + bf561-acvilon cm-bf561 blackstamp bf537-minotaur
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> bct-brettl2 cm-bf527 bf506f-ezkit ip04 bf527-sdp pr1
> >> >>>>> bf527-ad7160-eval bf609-ezkit bf537-stamp bf527-ezkit-v2 cm-bf537e
> >> >>>>> tcm-bf518 cm-bf537u bf527-ezkit cm-bf533 bf533-ezkit ibf-dsp561
> >> >>>>> bf537-pnav bf537-srv1 cm-bf548 bf538f-ezkit bf548-ezkit bf525-ucr2
> >> >>>>> blackvme tcm-bf537 bf533-stamp dnp5370 bf518f-ezbrd bf526-ezbrd
> >> >>>>> bf561-ezkit br4
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> aarch64: + test
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> avr32: + atngw100mkii grasshopper atstk1002 atngw100
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> sh: + sh7753evb sh7785lcr_32bit sh7785lcr
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> arc: + arcangel4-be axs101 axs103 tb100 arcangel4
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> openrisc: + openrisc-generic
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> powerpc: + TQM834x katmai
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> arm: + mx28evk mx28evk_nand xfi3 bg0900 sansa_fuze_plus
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> mx23evk m28evk sc_sps_1 mx28evk_spi apx4devkit mx23_olinuxino
> >> >>>>> mx28evk_auart_console
> >> >>>
> >> >>> All of MXS is broken, why ? I don't recall any chances to MXS being
> >> >>> done recently, so what happened ?
> >> >>
> >> >> I confirm this - I have not seen any breakage (but I built today with
> >> >> an older gcc). Bing, can you output what you have seen for mxs
> >> >> boards ? They looks ok to me.
> >> >
> >> > $ make m28evk_defconfig
> >> >
> >> > HOSTCC scripts/basic/fixdep
> >> > HOSTCC scripts/kconfig/conf.o
> >> > SHIPPED scripts/kconfig/zconf.tab.c
> >> > SHIPPED scripts/kconfig/zconf.lex.c
> >> > SHIPPED scripts/kconfig/zconf.hash.c
> >> > HOSTCC scripts/kconfig/zconf.tab.o
> >> > HOSTLD scripts/kconfig/conf
> >> >
> >> > #
> >> > # configuration written to .config
> >> > #
> >> > $ make
> >> > scripts/kconfig/conf --silentoldconfig Kconfig
> >> >
> >> > CHK include/config.h
> >> > UPD include/config.h
> >> > GEN include/autoconf.mk
> >> > GEN include/autoconf.mk.dep
> >> > GEN spl/include/autoconf.mk
> >> > CHK include/config/uboot.release
> >> > UPD include/config/uboot.release
> >> > CHK include/generated/version_autogenerated.h
> >> > UPD include/generated/version_autogenerated.h
> >> > CHK include/generated/timestamp_autogenerated.h
> >> > UPD include/generated/timestamp_autogenerated.h
> >> > CC lib/asm-offsets.s
> >> > CHK include/generated/generic-asm-offsets.h
> >> > UPD include/generated/generic-asm-offsets.h
> >> > CC arch/arm/lib/asm-offsets.s
> >> > CHK include/generated/asm-offsets.h
> >> > UPD include/generated/asm-offsets.h
> >> > HOSTCC tools/bmp_logo
> >> > HOSTCC tools/envcrc.o
> >> > WRAP tools/lib/crc32.c
> >> > HOSTCC tools/lib/crc32.o
> >> > WRAP tools/common/env_embedded.c
> >> > HOSTCC tools/common/env_embedded.o
> >> > WRAP tools/lib/sha1.c
> >> > HOSTCC tools/lib/sha1.o
> >> > HOSTLD tools/envcrc
> >> > HOSTCC tools/gen_eth_addr
> >> > HOSTCC tools/img2srec
> >> > HOSTCC tools/mkenvimage.o
> >> > HOSTCC tools/os_support.o
> >> > HOSTLD tools/mkenvimage
> >> > HOSTCC tools/aisimage.o
> >> > HOSTCC tools/atmelimage.o
> >> > WRAP tools/common/bootm.c
> >> > HOSTCC tools/common/bootm.o
> >> > HOSTCC tools/default_image.o
> >> > WRAP tools/lib/fdtdec_common.c
> >> > HOSTCC tools/lib/fdtdec_common.o
> >> > WRAP tools/lib/fdtdec.c
> >> > HOSTCC tools/lib/fdtdec.o
> >> > HOSTCC tools/fit_common.o
> >> > HOSTCC tools/fit_image.o
> >> > HOSTCC tools/gpimage.o
> >> > HOSTCC tools/gpimage-common.o
> >> > WRAP tools/common/image-fit.c
> >> > HOSTCC tools/common/image-fit.o
> >> > HOSTCC tools/image-host.o
> >> > WRAP tools/common/image.c
> >> > HOSTCC tools/common/image.o
> >> > HOSTCC tools/imagetool.o
> >> > HOSTCC tools/imximage.o
> >> > HOSTCC tools/kwbimage.o
> >> > WRAP tools/lib/md5.c
> >> > HOSTCC tools/lib/md5.o
> >> > HOSTCC tools/lpc32xximage.o
> >> > HOSTCC tools/mxsimage.o
> >> > HOSTCC tools/omapimage.o
> >> > HOSTCC tools/pblimage.o
> >> > HOSTCC tools/pbl_crc32.o
> >> > WRAP tools/lib/rc4.c
> >> > HOSTCC tools/lib/rc4.o
> >> > HOSTCC tools/rkcommon.o
> >> > HOSTCC tools/rkimage.o
> >> > HOSTCC tools/rksd.o
> >> > HOSTCC tools/rkspi.o
> >> > HOSTCC tools/socfpgaimage.o
> >> > WRAP tools/lib/sha256.c
> >> > HOSTCC tools/lib/sha256.o
> >> > WRAP tools/common/hash.c
> >> > HOSTCC tools/common/hash.o
> >> > HOSTCC tools/ublimage.o
> >> > HOSTCC tools/zynqimage.o
> >> > WRAP tools/lib/libfdt/fdt.c
> >> > HOSTCC tools/lib/libfdt/fdt.o
> >> > WRAP tools/lib/libfdt/fdt_ro.c
> >> > HOSTCC tools/lib/libfdt/fdt_ro.o
> >> > WRAP tools/lib/libfdt/fdt_rw.c
> >> > HOSTCC tools/lib/libfdt/fdt_rw.o
> >> > WRAP tools/lib/libfdt/fdt_strerror.c
> >> > HOSTCC tools/lib/libfdt/fdt_strerror.o
> >> > WRAP tools/lib/libfdt/fdt_wip.c
> >> > HOSTCC tools/lib/libfdt/fdt_wip.o
> >> > WRAP tools/lib/libfdt/fdt_region.c
> >> > HOSTCC tools/lib/libfdt/fdt_region.o
> >> > HOSTCC tools/dumpimage.o
> >> > HOSTLD tools/dumpimage
> >> > HOSTCC tools/mkimage.o
> >> > HOSTLD tools/mkimage
> >> > HOSTCC tools/mxsboot
> >> >
> >> > tools/mxsboot.c: In function ?mx28_create_sd_image?:
> >> > tools/mxsboot.c:560: warning: implicit declaration of function
> >> > ?htole32? /tmp/cchLIV6q.o: In function `main':
> >> > mxsboot.c:(.text+0x6d8): undefined reference to `htole32'
> >> > mxsboot.c:(.text+0x6e7): undefined reference to `htole32'
> >> > mxsboot.c:(.text+0x6f6): undefined reference to `htole32'
> >> > mxsboot.c:(.text+0x705): undefined reference to `htole32'
> >> > mxsboot.c:(.text+0x711): undefined reference to `htole32'
> >> > /tmp/cchLIV6q.o:mxsboot.c:(.text+0x71d): more undefined references to
> >> > `htole32' follow
> >> > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
> >> > make[1]: *** [tools/mxsboot] Error 1
> >> > make: *** [tools] Error 2
> >> >
> >> > I am using gcc 4.1.2 as the HOSTCC.
> >>
> >> Just switched to gcc 4.7.2 as the HOSTCC, still have this 'htole32'
> >> error. As Tom mentioned, this might be related to the host openssl-dev
> >> enviroment?
> >
> > No, it's not. Try this patch:
> >
> > --8<--
> > diff --git a/tools/mxsboot.c b/tools/mxsboot.c
> > index 3434c81..dd1027d 100644
> > --- a/tools/mxsboot.c
> > +++ b/tools/mxsboot.c
> > @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
> >
> > * SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
> > */
> >
> > +#define _BSD_SOURCE
> >
> > #include <endian.h>
> > #include <fcntl.h>
> > #include <sys/stat.h>
> >
> > -->8--
>
> No, it does not work with either gcc 4.1.2 or 4.7.2 :(
>
> tools/mxsboot.c:10:1: warning: "_BSD_SOURCE" redefined
> In file included from /usr/include/stdint.h:26,
> from ././include/compiler.h:19,
> from ././include/libfdt_env.h:12,
> from <command line>:1:
> /usr/include/features.h:162:1: warning: this is the location of the
> previous definition
> tools/mxsboot.c: In function ?mx28_create_sd_image?:
> tools/mxsboot.c:561: warning: implicit declaration of function ?htole32?
> /tmp/ccGE1ile.o: In function `main':
> mxsboot.c:(.text+0x6d8): undefined reference to `htole32'
> mxsboot.c:(.text+0x6e7): undefined reference to `htole32'
> mxsboot.c:(.text+0x6f6): undefined reference to `htole32'
> mxsboot.c:(.text+0x705): undefined reference to `htole32'
> mxsboot.c:(.text+0x711): undefined reference to `htole32'
> /tmp/ccGE1ile.o:mxsboot.c:(.text+0x71d): more undefined references to
> `htole32' follow
> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
> make[1]: *** [tools/mxsboot] Error 1
> make: *** [tools] Error 2
>
> > It does the same thing the manpage endian(3) suggests. But I wonder if we
> > shouldn't instead switch to something more portable ?

Ow, then a bit of googling shows this patch: