From: Albert ARIBAUD <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 0/7] fdt: Replace u-boot-dtb.bin with u-boot.bin
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2016 08:31:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160201083124.6b9f2efb@lilith> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1454289055-17054-1-git-send-email-sjg@chromium.org>
Hello Simon,
Nitpicking:
On Sun, 31 Jan 2016 18:10:48 -0700, Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
wrote:
> The original decision to use a separate u-boot-dtb.bin was aimed at allowing
> any device tree file to be concatenated to the u-boot.bin image after the
> build. However this no-longer seems so important. More important is the
> convenience of using the same output file regardless of the setting for
> OF_CONTROL.
Maybe explain in a few words why concatenating the DT no long seems
important, so that readers who were intending to concatenate get a hint
on what option they should follow instead?
Amicalement,
--
Albert.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-01 7:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-01 1:10 [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 0/7] fdt: Replace u-boot-dtb.bin with u-boot.bin Simon Glass
2016-02-01 1:10 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 1/7] tegra: Clarify generation of -nodtb file with OF_CONTROL Simon Glass
2016-02-02 1:57 ` [U-Boot] [U-Boot, v3, " Tom Rini
2016-02-02 1:58 ` Tom Rini
2016-02-01 1:10 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 2/7] fdt: Build a U-Boot binary without device tree Simon Glass
2016-02-02 1:58 ` [U-Boot] [U-Boot, v3, " Tom Rini
2016-02-01 1:10 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 3/7] fdt: Build an SPL " Simon Glass
2016-02-02 1:58 ` [U-Boot] [U-Boot, v3, " Tom Rini
2016-02-01 1:10 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 4/7] tegra: Always build a boot image with the same filename Simon Glass
2016-02-01 22:52 ` Stephen Warren
2016-02-02 1:58 ` [U-Boot] [U-Boot, v3, " Tom Rini
2016-02-01 1:10 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 5/7] socfpga: Simplify Makefile filenames Simon Glass
2016-02-02 1:58 ` [U-Boot] [U-Boot,v3,5/7] " Tom Rini
2016-02-01 1:10 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 6/7] Makefile: Make u-boot.img the same as u-boot-dtb.img Simon Glass
2016-02-01 22:54 ` Stephen Warren
2016-02-02 1:59 ` Tom Rini
2016-02-02 1:58 ` [U-Boot] [U-Boot, v3, " Tom Rini
2016-02-01 1:10 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 7/7] Makefile: Drop unnecessary -dtb suffixes Simon Glass
2016-02-02 1:58 ` [U-Boot] [U-Boot, v3, " Tom Rini
2016-02-01 7:31 ` Albert ARIBAUD [this message]
2016-02-02 0:05 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 0/7] fdt: Replace u-boot-dtb.bin with u-boot.bin Simon Glass
2016-02-01 23:00 ` Stephen Warren
2016-02-02 1:59 ` Tom Rini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160201083124.6b9f2efb@lilith \
--to=albert.u.boot@aribaud.net \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox