From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tom Rini Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2016 18:13:32 -0400 Subject: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 2/2] mmc: add support for block device cache In-Reply-To: <56EEFB99.2080805@nelint.com> References: <56E9A92F.5000205@nelint.com> <1458164424-15363-1-git-send-email-eric@nelint.com> <1458164424-15363-3-git-send-email-eric@nelint.com> <56EB2060.8040309@wwwdotorg.org> <56EEFB99.2080805@nelint.com> Message-ID: <20160320221332.GU23166@bill-the-cat> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 12:35:53PM -0700, Eric Nelson wrote: > Hi Stephen, > > On 03/17/2016 02:23 PM, Stephen Warren wrote: > > On 03/16/2016 03:40 PM, Eric Nelson wrote: > >> Signed-off-by: Eric Nelson > > > > Patch description. > > > >> --- > >> drivers/mmc/mmc.c | 10 +++++++++- > >> drivers/mmc/mmc_write.c | 7 +++++++ > > > > Presumably it makes sense for the cache to work for IDE, SATA, USB, > > SCSI, ... too. I wonder if it's possible to put this code somewhere more > > central than mmc*.c so it automatically applies to > > dev_desc->block_read() (see include/part.h). Perhaps not since each > > implementation supplies its own block_read function directly, so the > > cache calls do need to be duplicated everywhere. > > > > Yeah. I haven't found a spot that would allow interception of > the various block_read/write functions. Shouldn't DM also help here? -- Tom -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: