From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tom Rini Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 18:08:34 -0400 Subject: [U-Boot] Custodian Repo for Broadcom (arm) boards In-Reply-To: References: <20160411215633.GT13577@bill-the-cat> Message-ID: <20160411220834.GU13577@bill-the-cat> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 03:01:10PM -0700, Steve Rae wrote: > Hi Tom, > > On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 2:56 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 11:55:49AM -0700, Steve Rae wrote: > > > >> Tom & Albert, > >> Please approve the creation of a custodian repo for the Broadcom (arm) boards. > >> ( Wolfgang already has my public key... ) > >> > >> Wolfgang stated: > >> > Before I can set up a new custodian repo, please post your > >> > offer on the U-Boot mailing list - I think the chips in question > >> > belong to the ARM architecture (?), so both the ARM custodian (Albert) > >> > and Tom should agree with the creation of such a new repo. Once I > >> > have their "go" it is only a matter of minutes. > > > > So, I do have a few BCM patches outstanding (and I'm build testing them > > now). ELC kicked -rc1 out a week (I'll be tagging it once I have this > > series happy enough to push out with it). Are you expecting the volume > > of boards to increase? Thanks! > > No -- only planning to add 2 new boards.... > It is just that with the current process, I waiting "months" to get > patches applied - so Marek suggested that maybe I need to be a > custodian, so that I can move things along.... Er, months? Sorry, I'm not seeing it right away at least: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/list/?submitter=64015&state=* (and questions about how did .... get into state ... ? are answered with "I took a stab at it"). -- Tom -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: