From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tom Rini Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 18:34:23 -0400 Subject: [U-Boot] Custodian Repo for Broadcom (arm) boards In-Reply-To: References: <20160411215633.GT13577@bill-the-cat> <20160411220834.GU13577@bill-the-cat> Message-ID: <20160411223423.GV13577@bill-the-cat> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 03:13:37PM -0700, Steve Rae wrote: > On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 3:08 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 03:01:10PM -0700, Steve Rae wrote: > >> Hi Tom, > >> > >> On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 2:56 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > >> > On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 11:55:49AM -0700, Steve Rae wrote: > >> > > >> >> Tom & Albert, > >> >> Please approve the creation of a custodian repo for the Broadcom (arm) boards. > >> >> ( Wolfgang already has my public key... ) > >> >> > >> >> Wolfgang stated: > >> >> > Before I can set up a new custodian repo, please post your > >> >> > offer on the U-Boot mailing list - I think the chips in question > >> >> > belong to the ARM architecture (?), so both the ARM custodian (Albert) > >> >> > and Tom should agree with the creation of such a new repo. Once I > >> >> > have their "go" it is only a matter of minutes. > >> > > >> > So, I do have a few BCM patches outstanding (and I'm build testing them > >> > now). ELC kicked -rc1 out a week (I'll be tagging it once I have this > >> > series happy enough to push out with it). Are you expecting the volume > >> > of boards to increase? Thanks! > >> > >> No -- only planning to add 2 new boards.... > >> It is just that with the current process, I waiting "months" to get > >> patches applied - so Marek suggested that maybe I need to be a > >> custodian, so that I can move things along.... > > > > Er, months? Sorry, I'm not seeing it right away at least: > > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/list/?submitter=64015&state=* > > (and questions about how did .... get into state ... ? are answered with > > "I took a stab at it"). > > how about: > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/list/?submitter=64015&state=&q=&archive=&delegate= > shows two outstanding from Feb 9 !!! > (plus the three that I assume you are currently working on.....) ... yes, the gadget ones that wouldn't go through a BCM tree anyhow :) But... I think I mis-assigned them in patchwork and it should be in my queue anyhow, sorry. -- Tom -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: