[U-Boot] Custodian Repo for Broadcom (arm) boards

[Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>]

On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 03:54:01PM -0700, Steve Rae wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 3:34 PM, Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 03:13:37PM -0700, Steve Rae wrote:
> >> On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 3:08 PM, Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> wrote:
> >> > On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 03:01:10PM -0700, Steve Rae wrote:
> >> >> Hi Tom,
> >> >>
> >> >> On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 2:56 PM, Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> wrote:
> >> >> > On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 11:55:49AM -0700, Steve Rae wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> Tom & Albert,
> >> >> >> Please approve the creation of a custodian repo for the Broadcom (arm) boards.
> >> >> >> ( Wolfgang already has my public key... )
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Wolfgang stated:
> >> >> >> > Before I can set up a new custodian repo, please post your
> >> >> >> > offer on the U-Boot mailing list -  I think the chips in question
> >> >> >> > belong to the ARM architecture (?), so both the ARM custodian (Albert)
> >> >> >> > and Tom should agree with the creation of such a new repo.  Once I
> >> >> >> > have their "go" it is only a matter of minutes.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > So, I do have a few BCM patches outstanding (and I'm build testing them
> >> >> > now).  ELC kicked -rc1 out a week (I'll be tagging it once I have this
> >> >> > series happy enough to push out with it).  Are you expecting the volume
> >> >> > of boards to increase?  Thanks!
> >> >>
> >> >> No -- only planning to add 2 new boards....
> >> >> It is just that with the current process, I waiting "months" to get
> >> >> patches applied - so Marek suggested that maybe I need to be a
> >> >> custodian, so that I can move things along....
> >> >
> >> > Er, months?  Sorry, I'm not seeing it right away at least:
> >> > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/list/?submitter=64015&state=*
> >> > (and questions about how did .... get into state ... ? are answered with
> >> > "I took a stab at it").
> >>
> >> how about:
> >> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/list/?submitter=64015&state=&q=&archive=&delegate=
> >> shows two outstanding from Feb 9  !!!
> >> (plus the three that I assume you are currently working on.....)
> >
> > ... yes, the gadget ones that wouldn't go through a BCM tree anyhow :)
> >
> > But... I think I mis-assigned them in patchwork and it should be in my
> > queue anyhow, sorry.
> >
> 
> OK -- then I am OK to abandon this "custodian request" .....
> 
> I guess I just need to know:
> -- what is a "typical" timeframe for getting stuff applied, and
> -- "how" and "who" to nudge in order to get things moving along - when
> that timeframe has expired....

Well, this was probably the outside edge of it.  I saw these before
making v2016.03 but since it's a tricky enough area I didn't want to
grab them before release.  Then I figured they would get picked up by
the custodian for v2016.05-rc1.  They didn't since I mis-assigned them.

> -- how to escalate when those "nudges" seem to be ignored....

Well, if something is posted after $X-rc1 and not merged by $((X +
1))-rc1, please reply to the release email asking if someone can grab
$patches as they've been around for a while.

-- 
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20160412/bd67708c/attachment.sig>