From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nikita Kiryanov <nikita@compulab.co.il>
Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2016 13:33:47 +0300
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 00/12] Introduce layout aware eeprom commands
In-Reply-To: <57135BAB.4070400@denx.de>
References: <1460818513-24895-1-git-send-email-nikita@compulab.co.il>
 <57135BAB.4070400@denx.de>
Message-ID: <20160417103336.GA30053@skynet>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Hi Marek,

On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 11:47:23AM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 04/16/2016 04:55 PM, Nikita Kiryanov wrote:
> > This series introduces eeprom layout aware capabilities to the existing eeprom
> > command, and then enables this feature on Compulab boards. It is an import of
> > the Compulab eeprom-utility (https://github.com/compulab/eeprom-util), and it
> > introduces 2 new options to the eeprom command:
> > 
> > eeprom print [-l <layout_version>] bus_num device_addr
> 
> The bus number starts to become a problem, esp. when used with DM and
> where the bus number can change between boots.

Are you referring to the fact that the command allows the user to not specify
the bus number (relying on a default value instead)? If so, I agree with you
that it is problematic. If I had my way I would've made it a mendatory
parameter along with the device address, but that will hurt backwards
compatibility. I'll be more than happy to redo the last 3 patches if we
agree that we are willing to pay that price.

> 
> Best regards,
> Marek Vasut
>