From: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ARM: mx6: Enable MMC FS boot support
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 08:02:32 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160428120232.GI19598@bill-the-cat> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOCHtYhDhA3nJ8X84t_xuA1yiDCBJ+j4aN6fM+31QYK0m2s0EQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 08:06:24PM -0500, Robert Nelson wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 7:54 PM, Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 02:02:05AM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > > On 04/28/2016 01:49 AM, Robert Nelson wrote:
> > [snip]
> > > > 1:
> > > >
> > > > Yeap, end users like to delete "MLO/u-boot.img" that was in the "fat"
> > > > boot partition in our production beaglebone images specifically
> > > > "2014-05-14" which was shipped by default on rev C. Thus
> > > > soft-bricking/etc boards..
> > >
> > > OK, so because hypothetical user is an idiot, we should use sub-par
> > > solution ? User can also be an idiot and generate U-Boot which is over 1
> > > MiB, in which case I will turn your argument around against you. Sorry,
> > > I am not buying this.
> >
> > No, real users. Lots of them. From nearly every "community" oriented
> > board ever. Which is why the distros also go for this method, point #2.
> >
> > > > http://beagleboard.org/latest-images
> > > >
> > > > Moving it under the 1MB location, has solved that problem.
> > >
> > > Until u-boot grows over 1 MiB. This only postponed the problem.
> > > Since there is filesystem support in the SPL, we should use that
> > > as a superior solution which doesn't suffer from this problem.
> >
> > I thought people were supposed to be aligning their first partitions
> > much higher these days, 4MiB? as the general case for being safe
> > regardless of the actual flash in the SD card. Setting aside sandbox
> > which I hope grows extremely large for testing purposes, I really hope
> > U-Boot + SPL can always stay under 1MiB. Our job is to boot the next
> > stage. If we get so large in our design of implementing things that we
> > forget this, we have a problem.
> >
>
> I've followed the 4kb convention and fdisk defaults to 1MB offset: (even
> thou we aren't dealing spinning disks)
>
> https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/library/l-linux-on-4kb-sector-disks/
>
> I haven't looked at the latest eMMC spec, but the eMMC 'boot' sections on
> current silicon is only 1MB (x2)
>
> mmcblk1boot0 179:16 0 1M 1 disk
> mmcblk1boot1 179:24 0 1M 1 disk
> mmcblk1 179:8 0 1.8G 0 disk
eMMC is "different" since you don't partition the boot sections usually,
so offset of 0 is good. But for the eMMC itself when you do partition
it I'd have sworn 4MiB was what to align on. I haven't thrown
flashbench on something in a while however...
--
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20160428/91e3c170/attachment.sig>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-28 12:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-27 23:06 [U-Boot] [PATCH] ARM: mx6: Enable MMC FS boot support Marek Vasut
2016-04-27 23:16 ` Tom Rini
2016-04-27 23:28 ` Marek Vasut
2016-04-27 23:32 ` Robert Nelson
2016-04-27 23:41 ` Marek Vasut
2016-04-27 23:49 ` Robert Nelson
2016-04-28 0:02 ` Marek Vasut
2016-04-28 0:54 ` Tom Rini
2016-04-28 1:06 ` Robert Nelson
2016-04-28 12:02 ` Tom Rini [this message]
2016-04-28 2:24 ` Peng Fan
2016-04-28 5:59 ` Stefano Babic
2016-04-28 11:03 ` Marek Vasut
2016-04-28 13:36 ` Stefano Babic
2016-04-28 13:40 ` Marek Vasut
2016-04-28 18:06 ` Tom Rini
2016-04-28 18:29 ` Marek Vasut
2016-04-28 19:02 ` Tom Rini
2016-04-28 22:37 ` Marek Vasut
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160428120232.GI19598@bill-the-cat \
--to=trini@konsulko.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox