[U-Boot] spl_mmc: allow to load raw image

[Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>]

On Sun, May 01, 2016 at 05:37:42PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> Hi Adam,
> 
> 
> 2016-04-30 3:06 GMT+09:00 Adam Ford <aford173@gmail.com>:
> > On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 12:53 PM, Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> wrote:
> >> On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 09:59:00AM -0500, Adam Ford wrote:
> >>
> >>> Does anyone with an OMAP3 board have any issues with this patch?  I
> >>> will admit I haven't stayed on top of stuff due to moving, and other
> >>> issues at home, but I pulled down the master to reviews some on
> >>> related stuff, and found that master doesn't boot.  I used git bisect
> >>> this morning and it narrowed down a problem with booting to this
> >>> patch.
> >>>
> >>> With the patch, I get:
> >>>
> >>> U-Boot SPL 2016.03-00378-g4976f48 (Apr 29 2016 - 09:25:27)
> >>> Trying to boot from MMC
> >>
> >> OK.  Do you have u-boot.bin or u-boot.img (which?) written to the raw
> >> offset in MMC or from filesystem?  Based on the log it looks like
> >> filesystem.
> >
> > I have u-boot.img copied to the fatfs on the card, but I didn't put it
> > in a specific location.
> >
> > I never used to have to do that.  Is this a new behavior and is it
> > documented somewhere?
> >
> > adam
> 
> 
> You are expecting to boot it from FAT,
> but I think spl_boot_mode() on your board returns MMCSD_MODE_RAW.
> 
> Can you fix the function to return MMCSD_MODE_FS?
> 
> 
> 
> This commit changed to allow to load raw U-Boot image,
> so MMCSD_MODE_RAW never fails.
> 
> So, you can no longer rely on the former behavior
> "try MMCSD_MODE_RAW first, and fallback to MMCSD_MODE_FS".

Well, I forgot to ask, is MLO being loaded from FAT or from raw?

-- 
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20160501/b6938763/attachment.sig>