From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 01/11] ARM: PSCI: change PSCI function IDs base and offsets
Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 16:54:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160523155419.GC4976@leverpostej> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1463562634-16723-2-git-send-email-hongbo.zhang@nxp.com>
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 05:10:24PM +0800, macro.wave.z at gmail.com wrote:
> From: Wang Dongsheng <dongsheng.wang@nxp.com>
>
> According to PSCI specification v1.0, the PSCI functions should start from
> 0x84000000 for SMC32, this patch changes this base value as well as other
> function offset values.
I agree that these are the correct valeus for PSCI 0.2, and we must use
those IDs for PSCI 0.2+.
However, this code is also used on platforms using PSCI 0.1, which did
not have well-defined IDs, and relied on them being described in the DT.
I fear that this may have the unintended sonequence of breaking those.
Does U-Boot patch the DT with the correct IDs per the PSCI 0.1 binding?
If so, then things are fine.
Thanks,
Mark.
> Signed-off-by: Wang Dongsheng <dongsheng.wang@nxp.com>
> Signed-off-by: Hongbo Zhang <hongbo.zhang@nxp.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/include/asm/psci.h | 10 +++++-----
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/psci.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/psci.h
> index 128a606..a4a19e3 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/psci.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/psci.h
> @@ -19,13 +19,13 @@
> #define __ARM_PSCI_H__
>
> /* PSCI interface */
> -#define ARM_PSCI_FN_BASE 0x95c1ba5e
> +#define ARM_PSCI_FN_BASE 0x84000000
> #define ARM_PSCI_FN(n) (ARM_PSCI_FN_BASE + (n))
>
> -#define ARM_PSCI_FN_CPU_SUSPEND ARM_PSCI_FN(0)
> -#define ARM_PSCI_FN_CPU_OFF ARM_PSCI_FN(1)
> -#define ARM_PSCI_FN_CPU_ON ARM_PSCI_FN(2)
> -#define ARM_PSCI_FN_MIGRATE ARM_PSCI_FN(3)
> +#define ARM_PSCI_FN_CPU_SUSPEND ARM_PSCI_FN(1)
> +#define ARM_PSCI_FN_CPU_OFF ARM_PSCI_FN(2)
> +#define ARM_PSCI_FN_CPU_ON ARM_PSCI_FN(3)
> +#define ARM_PSCI_FN_MIGRATE ARM_PSCI_FN(5)
>
> #define ARM_PSCI_RET_SUCCESS 0
> #define ARM_PSCI_RET_NI (-1)
> --
> 2.1.4
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-23 15:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-18 9:10 [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 00/11] ARMv7: PSCI: add PSCI v1.0 support macro.wave.z at gmail.com
2016-05-18 9:10 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 01/11] ARM: PSCI: change PSCI function IDs base and offsets macro.wave.z at gmail.com
2016-05-18 9:19 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2016-05-19 8:40 ` Hongbo Zhang
2016-05-19 8:42 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2016-05-18 10:07 ` Andre Przywara
2016-05-19 8:45 ` Hongbo Zhang
2016-05-19 9:07 ` Andre Przywara
2016-05-20 11:26 ` Hongbo Zhang
2016-05-23 15:54 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2016-05-24 6:21 ` Hongbo Zhang
2016-05-18 9:10 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 02/11] ARM: PSCI: change PSCI related macros definition style macro.wave.z at gmail.com
2016-05-18 9:10 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 03/11] ARMv7: PSCI: update function psci_get_cpu_stack_top macro.wave.z at gmail.com
2016-05-18 9:10 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 04/11] ARMv7: PSCI: update the place of saving target PC macro.wave.z at gmail.com
2016-05-18 9:10 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 05/11] ARMv7: PSCI: add codes to save context ID for CPU_ON macro.wave.z at gmail.com
2016-05-18 9:10 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 06/11] ARMv7: PSCI: factor out reusable psci_cpu_on_common macro.wave.z at gmail.com
2016-05-18 9:10 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 07/11] ARMv7: PSCI: add PSCI v1.0 functions skeleton macro.wave.z at gmail.com
2016-05-18 10:39 ` Andre Przywara
2016-05-19 8:23 ` Hongbo Zhang
2016-05-27 17:25 ` York Sun
2016-05-30 2:11 ` Hongbo Zhang
2016-05-18 9:10 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 08/11] ARMv7: PSCI: ls102xa: check target CPU ID before further operations macro.wave.z at gmail.com
2016-05-18 9:23 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2016-05-19 7:13 ` Hongbo Zhang
2016-05-18 9:10 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 09/11] ARMv7: PSCI: ls102xa: check ALREADY_ON or ON_PENDING for CPU_ON macro.wave.z at gmail.com
2016-05-18 9:10 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 10/11] ARMv7: PSCI: ls102xa: add more PSCI v1.0 functions implemention macro.wave.z at gmail.com
2016-05-18 9:10 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 11/11] ARMv7: PSCI: ls102xa: move secure text section into OCRAM macro.wave.z at gmail.com
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160523155419.GC4976@leverpostej \
--to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox