From: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 1/5] spl: dfu: add dfu support in SPL
Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 11:55:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160531115526.1e8f4fc0@amdc2363> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6C6B28D4DC342643927BEAFCE8707BF67620F9F8@DBDE04.ent.ti.com>
Hi Ravi,
> Hi Lucasz
>
> Thanks for active support.
>
> >> >> >
> >> >> > - Would it be hard to add SPL-DFU support also to BeagleBone
> >> >> > Black(am335x) (BBB) board? I'm asking since BBB is far more
> >> >> > pervasive than dra7x (and I might be able to cover SPL-DFU
> >> >> > easily with our new ptest (DFU) test suite).
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> It's possible to extend this for other platform, but SPL size
> >> >> would be 152k.
> >>
> >> >That was my point to reduce the size as much as possible and only
> >> >provide minimal functionality to fit the bill.
> >>
> >> Since DFU is tighly coupled to u-boot infrastructure , the size
> >> will increase due to multiple dependencies to compile u-boot DFU
> >> source in SPL. Let me re-think on possibility and come back.
>
> >If you would need any assistance, please let me know (I don't have
> >dra7x, but I do have Beagle Bone Black).
>
> The current implementation of dfu (drivers/dfu/dfu.c) relies on
> environment modules (getenv,setenv), and hash algo methods. The
> mandatory modules for DFU includes USB(dwc3/musb), gadget,
> drivers/dfu, hash, environ modules. Added to this mmc/sf support,
> with filesystem fat/ext4 would definitely increase the size.
>
I've double checked BBB SPL setup:
- SPL is the MLO (./common/spl/)
- Its size shall be less than 128 KiB
- It can reside on eMMC (fat partition, raw LBA offset), NAND or be sent
via serial port.
I've build the am335x_boneblack_defconfig and MLO size is 75 KiB.
Please correct me, but it seems that the SPL-DFU support adds around
30 KiB to SPL binary size.
If yes, then even BBB's SPL can support DFU without any problems (105KiB
< 128 KiB).
I'm also wondering if we could even shrink the code more with
reusing or extending the code@./common/spl/spl_{ext|fat|mmc|sf,
etc}.c (in this way we avoid adding the whole fat, ext, sf "commands").
For more aggressive size reduction we could for example disable hash
algo checking and add ./common/spl/spl_dfu.c file with ordinary
functions and rid of the need to add the whole dfu command.
> I have tried minimal subset adding DFU-SF serial flash support alone
> in SPL, this itself increases SPL size to 30K+ (SPL size approx.
> 107KB for dra7x).
>
> But beagle bone IRAM would be around 64KB right? Definetly this will
> not fit.
>
> Can we enable this feature for platform with minimum SRAM size of
> 160KB. So SPL-DFU cannot be supported for platform less than 160KB
> (like am335x).
I will ask on ML if there is any other interested party in SPL-DFU
support (and what are their limitations of SPL code size).
>
> Any suggestion ?
>
> Regards
> Ravi
>
--
Best regards,
Lukasz Majewski
Samsung R&D Institute Poland (SRPOL) | Linux Platform Group
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-31 9:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-27 13:39 [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 0/5] SPL: DFU Support in SPL Ravi Babu
2016-05-27 13:39 ` [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 1/5] spl: dfu: add dfu support " Ravi Babu
2016-05-30 11:54 ` Lukasz Majewski
2016-05-30 13:43 ` B, Ravi
2016-05-30 14:59 ` Lukasz Majewski
2016-05-31 6:39 ` B, Ravi
2016-05-31 8:39 ` Lukasz Majewski
2016-05-31 9:04 ` B, Ravi
2016-05-31 9:55 ` Lukasz Majewski [this message]
2016-05-31 10:34 ` B, Ravi
2016-05-31 12:47 ` Lukasz Majewski
2016-05-31 13:31 ` B, Ravi
2016-05-31 15:13 ` Lukasz Majewski
2016-06-02 12:39 ` B, Ravi
2016-06-02 14:14 ` Lukasz Majewski
2016-06-02 14:22 ` B, Ravi
2016-06-03 9:27 ` Lukasz Majewski
2016-06-03 11:35 ` B, Ravi
2016-06-03 11:45 ` Lukasz Majewski
2016-05-27 13:39 ` [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 2/5] spl: dfu: fs: adding ext4/fat filesystem support for SPL-DFU Ravi Babu
2016-05-30 11:59 ` Lukasz Majewski
2016-05-30 12:52 ` B, Ravi
2016-05-30 13:20 ` Lukasz Majewski
2016-05-30 13:52 ` B, Ravi
2016-05-27 13:39 ` [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 3/5] spl: dfu: adding dfu support functions " Ravi Babu
2016-05-30 5:27 ` Heiko Schocher
2016-05-30 12:04 ` Lukasz Majewski
2016-05-30 12:49 ` B, Ravi
2016-05-27 13:39 ` [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 4/5] dfu: spl: add generic spl-dfu function in common-spl Ravi Babu
2016-05-30 12:07 ` Lukasz Majewski
2016-05-27 13:39 ` [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 5/5] dra7x: spl: dfu: adding SPL-DFU support for dra7x platform Ravi Babu
2016-05-30 12:19 ` Lukasz Majewski
2016-05-27 13:42 ` [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 0/5] SPL: DFU Support in SPL Marek Vasut
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160531115526.1e8f4fc0@amdc2363 \
--to=l.majewski@samsung.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox