[U-Boot] [PATCH v3 6/9] spl: fit: add support for post-processing of images

[Andreas Dannenberg <dannenberg@ti.com>]

Hi Simon, please see below...

On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 08:28:07PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> On 27 June 2016 at 07:19, Andreas Dannenberg <dannenberg@ti.com> wrote:
> > diff --git a/include/image.h b/include/image.h
> > index d788c26..93d39e1 100644
> > --- a/include/image.h
> > +++ b/include/image.h
> > @@ -1173,4 +1173,21 @@ void android_print_contents(const struct andr_img_hdr *hdr);
> >   */
> >  int board_fit_config_name_match(const char *name);
> >
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_SPL_FIT_IMAGE_POST_PROCESS
> > +/**
> > + * board_fit_image_post_process() - Do any post-process on FIT binary data
> > + *
> > + * This is used to do any sort of image manipulation, verification, decryption
> > + * etc. in a platform or board specific way. Obviously, anything done here would
> > + * need to be comprehended in how the images were prepared before being injected
> > + * into the FIT creation (i.e. the binary blobs would have been pre-processed
> > + * before being added to the FIT image).
> > + *
> > + * @image: pointer to the image start pointer
> > + * @size: pointer to the image size
> > + * @return no return value (failure should be handled internally)
> > + */
> > +void board_fit_image_post_process(void **p_image, size_t *p_size);
> > +#endif /* CONFIG_SPL_FIT_IMAGE_POST_PROCESS */
> 
> We don't need #ifdef in header files - it just makes the code harder
> to read, and we'll still get a build error (with correct line number
> info) if someone uses it when they should not.

You are right that's technically not needed, but rather I was following
how other prototypes are defined in that header file (like the ones that
get declared when CONFIG_ANDROID_BOOT_IMAGE is defined).

For now I'm not planning to re-spin the patch series, but if there is
additional feedback I can take care of this one as well.

Thanks and Regards,

--
Andreas Dannenberg
Texas Instruments Inc