From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Antoine Tenart Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2016 18:30:49 +0200 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 5/9] tegra: select ARM_GIC for Tegra TK1s In-Reply-To: <87cdf582-3714-9fb2-f4b4-bcc6e20000c3@wwwdotorg.org> References: <20161006143401.12012-1-antoine.tenart@free-electrons.com> <20161006143401.12012-6-antoine.tenart@free-electrons.com> <87cdf582-3714-9fb2-f4b4-bcc6e20000c3@wwwdotorg.org> Message-ID: <20161006163049.GA938@kwain> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Hi Stephen, On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 10:15:06AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 10/06/2016 08:33 AM, Antoine Tenart wrote: > >Select the newly introduced ARM_GIC option to the relevant configuration > >which also have a psci implementation. > > >diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/tegra124/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/tegra124/Kconfig > > > config TARGET_JETSON_TK1 > > bool "NVIDIA Tegra124 Jetson TK1 board" > >+ select ARM_GIC > > select CPU_V7_HAS_NONSEC > > select CPU_V7_HAS_VIRT > > select ARCH_SUPPORT_PSCI > > > > config TARGET_CEI_TK1_SOM > > bool "Colorado Engineering Inc Tegra124 TK1-som board" > >+ select ARM_GIC > > select CPU_V7_HAS_NONSEC if !SPL_BUILD > > select CPU_V7_HAS_VIRT if !SPL_BUILD > > help > > This isn't correct; all Tegra variants have an ARM GIC; it's not > board-specific. Shouldn't CONFIG_TEGRA or CONFIG_TEGRA_COMMON select > ARM_GIC? I focused on adding ARM_GIC for targets using PSCI, but I was hopping for comments like this one :) I'll move the ARM_GIC selection to CONFIG_TEGRA or CONFIG_TEGRA_COMMON then. Thanks! Antoine -- Antoine T?nart, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: not available URL: