From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tom Rini Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 18:50:07 -0400 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/3] spl: Do not define U-Boot address on MMC if SPL is not defined In-Reply-To: <20161027162556.11195-3-semen.protsenko@linaro.org> References: <20161027162556.11195-1-semen.protsenko@linaro.org> <20161027162556.11195-3-semen.protsenko@linaro.org> Message-ID: <20161027225007.GL18591@bill-the-cat> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 07:25:55PM +0300, Sam Protsenko wrote: > There is no need to define U-Boot address on MMC in raw mode if SPL > build is disabled in board. > > Signed-off-by: Sam Protsenko We should fold this into the first patch and introduce the logic with depends correctly there. -- Tom -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: