* [U-Boot] [PATCH] armv8: define get_ticks() for the ARMv8 Generic Timer
@ 2016-11-03 0:56 Andre Przywara
2016-11-07 1:14 ` [U-Boot] " Tom Rini
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Andre Przywara @ 2016-11-03 0:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
For 64-bit ARM systems we provide just a timer_read_counter()
implementation and rely on the generic non-uclass get_ticks() function
in lib/time.c to call the former.
However this function is actually not 64-bit safe, as it assumes a
"long" to be 32-bit. Beside the fact that the resulting uint64_t
isn't bigger than "long" on 64-bit architectures and thus combining two
counters makes no sense, we get all kind of weird results when we try
to OR in the high value shifted by _32_ bits.
So let's avoid that function at all and provide a straight forward
get_ticks() implementation for ARMv8, which also is in line with ARMv7.
This fixes occasional immediate time-out expiration issues I see on the
Pine64 board. The root cause of this needs to be investigated, but this
fix looks like the right thing anyway.
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
---
arch/arm/cpu/armv8/generic_timer.c | 11 +++++++++++
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv8/generic_timer.c b/arch/arm/cpu/armv8/generic_timer.c
index 8f47a82..cd92b2c 100644
--- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv8/generic_timer.c
+++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv8/generic_timer.c
@@ -9,6 +9,8 @@
#include <command.h>
#include <asm/system.h>
+DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR;
+
/*
* Generic timer implementation of get_tbclk()
*/
@@ -41,6 +43,15 @@ unsigned long timer_read_counter(void)
return cntpct;
}
+unsigned long long get_ticks(void)
+{
+ unsigned long ticks = timer_read_counter();
+
+ gd->arch.tbl = ticks;
+
+ return ticks;
+}
+
unsigned long usec2ticks(unsigned long usec)
{
ulong ticks;
--
2.8.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] armv8: define get_ticks() for the ARMv8 Generic Timer
2016-11-03 0:56 [U-Boot] [PATCH] armv8: define get_ticks() for the ARMv8 Generic Timer Andre Przywara
@ 2016-11-07 1:14 ` Tom Rini
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Tom Rini @ 2016-11-07 1:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 12:56:25AM +0000, Andre Przywara wrote:
> For 64-bit ARM systems we provide just a timer_read_counter()
> implementation and rely on the generic non-uclass get_ticks() function
> in lib/time.c to call the former.
> However this function is actually not 64-bit safe, as it assumes a
> "long" to be 32-bit. Beside the fact that the resulting uint64_t
> isn't bigger than "long" on 64-bit architectures and thus combining two
> counters makes no sense, we get all kind of weird results when we try
> to OR in the high value shifted by _32_ bits.
> So let's avoid that function at all and provide a straight forward
> get_ticks() implementation for ARMv8, which also is in line with ARMv7.
>
> This fixes occasional immediate time-out expiration issues I see on the
> Pine64 board. The root cause of this needs to be investigated, but this
> fix looks like the right thing anyway.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Applied to u-boot/master, thanks!
--
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20161106/a06bc697/attachment.sig>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-11-07 1:14 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-11-03 0:56 [U-Boot] [PATCH] armv8: define get_ticks() for the ARMv8 Generic Timer Andre Przywara
2016-11-07 1:14 ` [U-Boot] " Tom Rini
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox