[U-Boot] [PATCH v2] travis: Add efi_loader grub2 test

[Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>]

On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 03:21:43PM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 11/18/2016 05:18 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
> >We have all the building blocks now to run arbitrary efi applications
> >in travis. The most important one out there is grub2, so let's add
> >a simple test to verify that grub2 still comes up.
> 
> >diff --git a/.travis.yml b/.travis.yml
> 
> >@@ -45,6 +48,9 @@ install:
> >  - virtualenv /tmp/venv
> >  - . /tmp/venv/bin/activate
> >  - pip install pytest
> >+ - grub-mkimage -o ~/grub_x86.efi -O i386-efi normal  echo lsefimmap lsefi lsefisystab efinet tftp minicmd
> >+ - mkdir ~/grub2-arm
> >+ - ( cd ~/grub2-arm; wget -O - http://download.opensuse.org/ports/armv7hl/distribution/leap/42.2/repo/oss/suse/armv7hl/grub2-arm-efi-2.02~beta2-87.1.armv7hl.rpm | rpm2cpio | cpio -di )
> 
> Do we really want to do this for all the build-only jobs too? I
> might have expected to do this inside the test scripts that actually
> use those binaries.

So, it's the difference between making various jobs / stanzas more
correct vs taking more time to do stuff.  Unless this starts to push the
"catch-all" arm job over the time limit, I don't think it's a big deal
either way.  And since travis-ci will tell us how long a given stanza
takes we'll have a good idea pretty quick on if that's starting to take
too long.  That said, I don't have a strong opinion here and it wouldn't
be too hard to move all of this into being under the TEST_PY_BD check
and since we aren't relying on apt, it's not going to be time-in-apt
factor.

-- 
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20161121/ac79e439/attachment.sig>