From: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] arm: Remove unofficial mach-type number uses
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2017 07:58:10 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170125125810.GF22316@bill-the-cat> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170125082353.10e9d087.albert.aribaud@3adev.fr>
On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 08:23:53AM +0100, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> Hi Vladimir,
>
> Le Wed, 25 Jan 2017 03:34:13 +0200, Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@mleia.com> a
> ?crit :
>
> > Hypothetically it could be possible that a machine maintainer finds that
> > after rebasing private changes on top of the latest Linux release, a board
> > mach type is not recognized by the Linux kernel due to an expired and
> > removed entry in mach-types, then s/he updates a record in Russell's DB
> > to get the old machine type ID again. However a counterpart change in
> > U-boot board config won't be synced automatically, and IMHO it should be
> > stated that this problem is neglected, obviously because it causes
> > maintenance burden for no gain.
>
> I suspect there's also a case where a custom (non-mainline) kernel is
> used on a given board and expects a machine ID from U-Boot, but this
> machine ID is not required to be in RMK's list. Ugly, but such things
> happen.
>
> > That said, your change is good, it may produce a discontent in particular
> > cases, but it won't be problematic to remove it by partial commit
> > reverting and adding an explanatory comment into the code.
>
> Agreed.
Sigh, I guess we've got enough cases of this that I'll re-work things
based on the full mach-types list instead. Thanks folks!
--
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20170125/1d2d15f0/attachment.sig>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-25 12:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-24 21:31 [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] arm: Remove unofficial mach-type number uses Tom Rini
2017-01-24 21:31 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] arm: Clean up MACH_TYPE defines in config headers Tom Rini
2017-01-24 22:28 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] arm: Remove unofficial mach-type number uses Vladimir Zapolskiy
2017-01-24 23:13 ` Tom Rini
2017-01-25 1:34 ` Vladimir Zapolskiy
2017-01-25 7:15 ` Igor Grinberg
2017-01-25 7:23 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2017-01-25 12:58 ` Tom Rini [this message]
2017-01-25 7:25 ` Igor Grinberg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170125125810.GF22316@bill-the-cat \
--to=trini@konsulko.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox