[U-Boot] [PULL] u-boot-usb/master

Tom Rini
2015-05-25T12:35:00Z

On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 12:25:19PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On Monday, May 25, 2015 at 11:51:04 AM, Josh Wu wrote:
> > Hi, Marek
>
> Hi!
>
> > On 5/22/2015 9:30 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > > On Friday, May 22, 2015 at 02:34:25 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
> > >> On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 01:54:55AM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > >>> On Wednesday, May 20, 2015 at 01:24:06 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> > >>>> On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 07:58:26PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > >>>>> Updated PR, dropped the patch from Hans and picked the OHCI cache
> > >>>>> patch instead:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> The following changes since commit
> > >
> > > 0e6b7a28243175ae0874d53b6e6e4eff8548d71f:
> > >>>>> Merge git://git.denx.de/u-boot-samsung (2015-05-18 09:15:15 -0400)
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> are available in the git repository at:
> > >>>>> git://git.denx.de/u-boot-usb.git HEAD
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> for you to fetch changes up to d07e7c0b5bd9dc0044eafc730131d32539608303:
> > >>>>> usb: ohci: enable cache support (2015-05-19 19:57:30 +0200)
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Sigh, NAK still. Many PowerPC are failing over flush_dcache_range
> > >>>> (which should exist for them now..),
> > >>>
> > >>> Which ones please?
> > >>
> > >> M5485BFE,lp8x4x,vpac270_nor_128,colibri_pxa270,eb_cpux9k2,M5485AFE,at91r
> > >> m92
> > >> 00ek_ram,M5475EFE,M5475CFE,M5485HFE,polaris,M5485DFE,M5475DFE,vpac270_o
> > >> nd_2
> > >> 56,vpac270_nor_256,at91rm9200ek,M5485CFE,M5475FFE,M5475BFE,M5485GFE,M54
> > >> 85EF
> > >> E,balloon3,M5485FFE,eb_cpux9k2_ram,M5475GFE,M5475AFE,trizepsiv,edb9315a
> > >>
> > >> Which now that I look at it is not a list of PowerPC boards (I have to
> > >> admit my eyes glazed over at M... and I filed that as PowerPC) but m68k
> > >> and some ARM.
> > >
> > > Yeah. Josh, these boards were broken by your patch
> > > "usb: ohci: enable cache support" . I am dropping
> > > it now, so can you please fix the patch and resubmit?
> >
> > Ok, After a check it seems those cpus doesn't define the
> > flush_dcache_range()/invalidate_dcache_range() functions. I think I need
> > to find a way to distinguish those cpus.
>
> Better yet, make those few CPUs define those functions as empty.

... if that in fact makes sense :)

--
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20150525/cc4457ad/attachment.sig>