[U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: sunxi: initial support for NanoPi Neo2

[Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>]

On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 02:45:03PM +0200, Patrick Wildt wrote:
> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 01:44:26PM +0100, Andre Przywara wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > On 24/05/17 12:50, Andreas Färber wrote:
> > > Hej Patrick,
> > > 
> > > Am 09.05.2017 um 14:43 schrieb Patrick Wildt:
> > >> The NanoPi Neo2 is basically the same as the NanoPi Neo, but that they
> > >> replaced the SoC with the 64-bit Allwinner H5 SoC.  Add a (64-bit only)
> > >> defconfig defining the required options to build the U-Boot proper.
> > >>
> > >> Create a new .dts file for it by including the (32-bit) H3 SoC .dtsi
> > >> and changing the differing components accordingly, like it's been
> > >> done for the OrangePi PC 2.
> > >>
> > >> Signed-off-by: Patrick Wildt <patrick@blueri.se>
> > > 
> > > I've tested this patch on top of yesterday's master branch
> > > (4c78028737c3185f49f5691183aeac3478b5f699 "mksunxi_fit_atf.sh: Allow for
> > > this to complete when bl31.bin is missing").
> > > 
> > > Considering Tom's unanswered question, is there any diff to the upstream
> > > kernel .dts? Expected would be to just copy the Linux .dts file here and
> > > to state which tree and commit/tag it was taken from.
> 
> I mailed Tom in private asking what to explictly state since 90% was
> from u-boot and 10% from Linux-Sunxi (not mainline).  I didn't get a
> reply, so there was no further mail from me.
> 
> So should I pull it now from v4.12-rc2?

Sorry.  I'm trying to help make sure dts changes are on their way to the
mainline Linux kernel, so that we don't get out of sync.  So, does
v4.12-rc2 have everything you need?  Thanks!

-- 
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20170601/ed4ffd7c/attachment.sig>