From: Siarhei Siamashka <siarhei.siamashka@gmail.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] net: Mark the ip_udp_hdr struct as packed
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2017 21:46:40 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170721214640.701c5113@i7> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e1c76b48-0557-1c62-9570-49c3e05884b0@myspectrum.nl>
On Wed, 19 Jul 2017 20:26:54 +0200
Jeroen Hofstee <jeroen@myspectrum.nl> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> On 07/18/2017 08:10 PM, Joe Hershberger wrote:
> > Hi Maxime,
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 9:34 AM, Maxime Ripard
> > <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> wrote:
> >> The -mno-unaligned-access flag used on ARM to prevent GCC from generating
> >> unaligned accesses (obviously) will only do so on packed structures.
> >>
> >> It seems like gcc 7.1 is a bit stricter than previous gcc versions on this,
> >> and using it lead to data abort for unaligned accesses when generating
> >> network traffic.
> >>
> >> Fix this by adding the packed attribute to the ip_udp_hdr structure in
> >> order to let GCC do its job.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
> >> ---
> >> include/net.h | 2 +-
> >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/include/net.h b/include/net.h
> >> index 997db9210a8f..7b815afffafa 100644
> >> --- a/include/net.h
> >> +++ b/include/net.h
> >> @@ -390,7 +390,7 @@ struct ip_udp_hdr {
> >> u16 udp_dst; /* UDP destination port */
> >> u16 udp_len; /* Length of UDP packet */
> >> u16 udp_xsum; /* Checksum */
> >> -};
> >> +} __attribute__ ((packed));
> > Do you have an example of why this is unaligned? It seems that the
> > structure itself is naturally packed (each element is aligned to its
> > access size). It seems the only time this would hit a dabort is if the
> > head of the buffer is not 32-bit aligned. Maybe we should address the
> > place where that is the case instead of forcing byte-wise accesses in
> > general for this structure?
>
> |Perhaps __attribute__((aligned(2))) can prevent byte wise accesses?
> Regards, Jeroen |
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Common-Type-Attributes.html
It says that "The aligned attribute can only increase alignment".
--
Best regards,
Siarhei Siamashka
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-21 18:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-12 14:34 [U-Boot] [PATCH] net: Mark the ip_udp_hdr struct as packed Maxime Ripard
2017-07-18 18:10 ` Joe Hershberger
2017-07-19 7:01 ` Maxime Ripard
2017-07-19 18:13 ` Joe Hershberger
2017-07-19 18:26 ` Jeroen Hofstee
2017-07-21 18:46 ` Siarhei Siamashka [this message]
2017-07-22 13:32 ` Jeroen Hofstee
2017-07-19 18:14 ` Joe Hershberger
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-07-12 14:34 Maxime Ripard
2017-07-12 14:37 ` Dr. Philipp Tomsich
2017-07-17 9:29 ` Maxime Ripard
2017-07-18 2:35 ` Tom Rini
2017-07-21 19:15 ` Siarhei Siamashka
2017-07-21 19:37 ` Siarhei Siamashka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170721214640.701c5113@i7 \
--to=siarhei.siamashka@gmail.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox