public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/8] fs/fat: cleanups + readdir implementation
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2017 09:05:33 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170814130533.GE20467@bill-the-cat> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAF6AEGvzBGpXptMhPQBBnta_F0G=_oyT99GKjuNCehY0xNhf3g@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 08:48:47AM -0400, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 13, 2017 at 5:59 PM, Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 13, 2017 at 05:50:39PM -0400, Rob Clark wrote:
> >> On Sun, Aug 13, 2017 at 5:13 PM, Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> wrote:
> >> > On Sun, Aug 13, 2017 at 06:45:20AM -0400, Rob Clark wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Introduce directory traversal iterators, and implement fs_readdir()
> >> >> which is needed by EFI_LOADER.
> >> >>
> >> >> The part re-working fat.c to use the directory iterators itself is
> >> >> nearly a 2:1 negative diffstat, and a pretty big cleanup.  I fixed
> >> >> one or two other small issues along the way.  It hasn't really been
> >> >> tested with a wide variaty of different fat filesystems (if someone
> >> >> has a collection of disk images to test with somewhere, let me know),
> >> >> but it seems at least not worse than what it is replacing.
> >> >
> >> > Did you run test/fs/fs-test.sh and confirm there's at least no
> >> > regressions?  Thanks!
> >>
> >> I've been having trouble getting fs-test.sh to pass even without my
> >> changes, so no..
> >
> > Pass, or provide expected results?  From the script, we expect:
> > # Total Summary: TOTAL PASS: 132 TOTAL FAIL: 6
> 
> Ok, I was missing special case handling for the "partition is whole
> disk" case (which I *guess* is only a sandbox thing?)..

FWIW, nope, I believe some atmel boards utilize whole disk as FAT, IIRC,
from when I was trying to come up with a good default value for the
ENV_IS_IN_FAT Kconfig options.

[snip]
> fixed (and excluding the ext4 tests which have unrelated problems on
> my setup):
> 
> Total Summary: TOTAL PASS: 63 TOTAL FAIL: 6
> 
> So if the 6 failed fat tests (below) are "normal", then I guess we're
> good.. I'll post a v2 shortly.

Great, thanks!

-- 
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20170814/9c253d4e/attachment.sig>

      reply	other threads:[~2017-08-14 13:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-08-13 10:45 [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/8] fs/fat: cleanups + readdir implementation Rob Clark
2017-08-13 10:45 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/8] fs/fat: split out helper to init fsdata Rob Clark
2017-08-13 10:45 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/8] fs/fat: introduce new director iterators Rob Clark
2017-08-13 10:45 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/8] fat/fs: convert to directory iterators Rob Clark
2017-08-13 10:45 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/8] fs: add fs_readdir() Rob Clark
2017-08-13 10:45 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 5/8] fs/fat: implement opendir/readdir/closedir Rob Clark
2017-08-13 10:45 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 6/8] fat/fs: remove a bunch of dead code Rob Clark
2017-08-13 11:11   ` Stefan Bruens
2017-08-13 10:45 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 7/8] fat/fs: move ls to generic implementation Rob Clark
2017-08-13 10:45 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 8/8] fs/fat: fix case for FAT shortnames Rob Clark
2017-08-13 11:25   ` Stefan Bruens
2017-08-13 12:14     ` Rob Clark
2017-08-13 18:09   ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 " Rob Clark
2017-08-13 11:28 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/8] fs/fat: cleanups + readdir implementation Heinrich Schuchardt
2017-08-13 12:13   ` Rob Clark
2017-08-13 21:13 ` Tom Rini
2017-08-13 21:50   ` Rob Clark
2017-08-13 21:59     ` Tom Rini
2017-08-14 12:48       ` Rob Clark
2017-08-14 13:05         ` Tom Rini [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170814130533.GE20467@bill-the-cat \
    --to=trini@konsulko.com \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox