[U-Boot] Should we reorganise arch/arm/dts into arch/arm/dts/<soc-vendor>?

[U-Boot] Should we reorganise arch/arm/dts into arch/arm/dts/<soc-vendor>?

[Dr. Philipp Tomsich]

Tom,

As one of my colleagues noticed, the list of files in arch/arm/dts grows with every release.

How about splitting this into subdirectories for each SOC vendor (e.g. arch/arm/dts/<soc-vendor>/) to reduce the clutter?
If this sounds like a good idea, let me know and I’ll start rearranging the rockchip-related files.

Regards,
Philipp.

[U-Boot] Should we reorganise arch/arm/dts into arch/arm/dts/<soc-vendor>?

[Tom Rini]

On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 09:00:05PM +0100, Dr. Philipp Tomsich wrote:
> Tom,
> 
> As one of my colleagues noticed, the list of files in arch/arm/dts
> grows with every release.
> 
> How about splitting this into subdirectories for each SOC vendor (e.g.
> arch/arm/dts/<soc-vendor>/) to reduce the clutter?
> If this sounds like a good idea, let me know and I’ll start
> rearranging the rockchip-related files.

I'm OK with a re-org to match how arch/arm64/boot/dts is today and how
arch/arm/boot/dts is moving to, but I want to keep them location-wise
in-sync.

-- 
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20171201/f8e243ce/attachment.sig>