From: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH] test: py: Disable sleep test for qemu targets
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2017 09:03:14 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171204140314.GB3587@bill-the-cat> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c487cdab-05b7-3b18-89c8-027a7761116e@xilinx.com>
On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 02:55:45PM +0100, Michal Simek wrote:
> On 1.12.2017 23:44, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 10:07:54AM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote:
> >> On 12/01/2017 08:19 AM, Michal Simek wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> On 1.12.2017 16:06, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On 12/01/2017 03:46 PM, Michal Simek wrote:
> >>>>> Qemu for arm32/arm64 has a problem with time setup.
> >>>>
> >>>> Wouldn't it be preferable to fix the root cause?
> >>>
> >>> Definitely that would be the best and IIRC I have tried to convince our
> >>> qemu guy to do that but they have never done that.
> >>
> >> What is the exact failure condition? Is it simply that the test is still
> >> slightly too strict about which delays it accepts, or is sleep outright
> >> broken?
> >>
> >> You can use command-line option -k to avoid some tests. For example "-k not
> >> sleep". That way, we don't have to hard-code the dependency into the test
> >> source. Depending on the root cause (issue in U-Boot, or issue in just your
> >> local version of qemu, or something that will never work) this might be
> >> better?
> >
> > Even with the most recent relaxing of the sleep test requirements, I can
> > still (depending on overall system load) have 'sleep' take too long, on
> > QEMU. I think it might have been half a second slow, but I don't have
> > the log handy anymore. Both locally and in travis we -k not sleep all
> > of the qemu instances.
>
> ok. By locally do you mean just using -k not sleep?
Yes, I have that in my CI scripts and similar.
--
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20171204/2cab3049/attachment.sig>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-04 14:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-01 14:46 [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH] test: py: Disable sleep test for qemu targets Michal Simek
2017-12-01 15:06 ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2017-12-01 15:19 ` Michal Simek
2017-12-01 17:07 ` Stephen Warren
2017-12-01 22:44 ` Tom Rini
2017-12-04 13:55 ` Michal Simek
2017-12-04 14:03 ` Tom Rini [this message]
2017-12-04 14:21 ` Michal Simek
2017-12-04 15:30 ` Tom Rini
2017-12-04 17:14 ` Stephen Warren
2017-12-04 23:21 ` Tom Rini
2017-12-05 18:20 ` Stephen Warren
2017-12-05 18:38 ` Tom Rini
2017-12-05 20:46 ` Daniel Schwierzeck
2017-12-06 9:49 ` Michal Simek
2017-12-05 12:10 ` Michal Simek
2017-12-05 15:13 ` Tom Rini
2017-12-06 9:53 ` Michal Simek
2017-12-06 12:17 ` Tom Rini
2017-12-08 13:08 ` Michal Simek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171204140314.GB3587@bill-the-cat \
--to=trini@konsulko.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox