From: "Lothar Waßmann" <LW@KARO-electronics.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v5 07/20] common: Generic firmware loader for file system
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2017 09:53:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171205095301.025ad551@karo-electronics.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1512460690-3454-8-git-send-email-tien.fong.chee@intel.com>
Hi,
On Tue, 5 Dec 2017 15:57:57 +0800 tien.fong.chee at intel.com wrote:
> From: Tien Fong Chee <tien.fong.chee@intel.com>
>
> This is file system generic loader which can be used to load
> the file image from the storage into target such as memory.
> The consumer driver would then use this loader to program whatever,
> ie. the FPGA device.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tien Fong Chee <tien.fong.chee@intel.com>
> ---
> common/Makefile | 1 +
> common/fs_loader.c | 304 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/fs_loader.h | 30 ++++++
> 3 files changed, 335 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 common/fs_loader.c
> create mode 100644 include/fs_loader.h
>
> diff --git a/common/Makefile b/common/Makefile
> index 801ea31..419e915 100644
> --- a/common/Makefile
> +++ b/common/Makefile
> @@ -130,3 +130,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_CMD_DFU) += dfu.o
> obj-y += command.o
> obj-y += s_record.o
> obj-y += xyzModem.o
> +obj-y += fs_loader.o
> diff --git a/common/fs_loader.c b/common/fs_loader.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..04f682b
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/common/fs_loader.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,304 @@
> +/*
> + * Copyright (C) 2017 Intel Corporation <www.intel.com>
> + *
> + * SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> + */
> +
> +#include <common.h>
> +#include <errno.h>
> +#include <fs.h>
> +#include <fs_loader.h>
> +#include <nand.h>
> +#include <sata.h>
> +#include <spi.h>
> +#include <spi_flash.h>
> +#include <spl.h>
> +#include <linux/string.h>
> +#include <usb.h>
> +
> +static struct device_location default_locations[] = {
> + {
> + .name = "mmc",
> + .devpart = "0:1",
> + },
> + {
> + .name = "usb",
> + .devpart = "0:1",
> + },
> + {
> + .name = "sata",
> + .devpart = "0:1",
> + },
> +};
> +
> +/* USB build is not supported yet in SPL */
> +#ifndef CONFIG_SPL_BUILD
> +#ifdef CONFIG_USB_STORAGE
> +static int init_usb(void)
> +{
> + int err = 0;
>
Useless initialization.
> + err = usb_init();
> +
> + if (err)
>
Unnecessary blank line.
> + return err;
> +
> +#ifndef CONFIG_DM_USB
> + err = usb_stor_scan(1) < 0 ? -ENODEV : 0;
> +#endif
> +
> + return err;
> +}
> +#else
> +static int init_usb(void)
> +{
> + printf("Error: Cannot load flash image: no USB support\n");
> + return -ENOSYS;
> +}
> +#endif
> +#endif
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SATA
> +static int init_storage_sata(void)
> +{
> + return sata_probe(0);
> +}
> +#else
> +static int init_storage_sata(void)
> +{
> + printf("Error: Cannot load image: no SATA support\n");
> + return -ENOSYS;
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CMD_UBIFS
> +static int mount_ubifs(struct device_location *location)
> +{
> + int ret = 0;
>
Useless initialization.
> + char cmd[32];
> +
> + sprintf(cmd, "ubi part %s", location->mtdpart);
> +
> + ret = run_command(cmd, 0);
> +
> + if (ret)
Unnecessary blank line.
> + return ret;
> +
> + sprintf(cmd, "ubifsmount %s", location->ubivol);
> +
> + ret = run_command(cmd, 0);
> +
> + return res;
>
s/res/ret/
You obviously never compiled this code with CONFIG_CMD_UBIFS enabled.
> +}
> +
> +static int umount_ubifs(void)
> +{
> + return run_command("ubifsumount", 0);
> +}
> +#else
> +static int mount_ubifs(struct device_location *location)
> +{
> + printf("Error: Cannot load image: no UBIFS support\n");
> + return -ENOSYS;
> +}
> +
> +static int umount_ubifs(void)
> +{
> + printf("Error: Cannot unmount UBIFS: no UBIFS support\n");
>
This error message is useless, since umount_ubifs() would
probably never be called when mount_ubifs() failed.
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> +#if defined(CONFIG_SPL_MMC_SUPPORT) && defined(CONFIG_SPL_BUILD)
> +static int init_mmc(void)
> +{
> + /* Just for the case MMC is not yet initialized */
> + struct mmc *mmc = NULL;
> + int err = 0;
>
Useless initialization.
> +
> + spl_mmc_find_device(&mmc, spl_boot_device());
> +
> + err = mmc_init(mmc);
> +
> + if (err) {
> + printf("spl: mmc init failed with error: %d\n", err);
> + return err;
> + }
> +
> + return err;
> +}
> +#else
> +static int init_mmc(void)
> +{
> + /* Expect somewhere already initialize MMC */
> + return 0;
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> +static int select_fs_dev(struct device_location *location)
> +{
> + int ret = 0;
>
Useless initialization. Omitting the initialization here makes sure,
that 'ret' is properly set in each of the below if/else clauses.
Otherwise the compiler will complain about an unitialized use of 'ret'.
> + if (!strcmp("mmc", location->name))
> + ret = fs_set_blk_dev("mmc", location->devpart, FS_TYPE_ANY);
> + else if (!strcmp("usb", location->name))
> + ret = fs_set_blk_dev("usb", location->devpart, FS_TYPE_ANY);
> + else if (!strcmp("sata", location->name))
> + ret = fs_set_blk_dev("sata", location->devpart, FS_TYPE_ANY);
> + else if (!strcmp("ubi", location->name))
> + if (location->ubivol != NULL)
> + ret = fs_set_blk_dev("ubi", NULL, FS_TYPE_UBIFS);
> + else
> + ret = -ENODEV;
> + else {
> + printf("Error: unsupported location storage.\n");
> + return -ENODEV;
> + }
> +
All if/else clauses should be enclosed in {}.
Refer to Documentation/CodingStyle in the Linux source which also
applies to U-Boot.
> + if (ret)
> + printf("Error: could not access storage.\n");
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int init_storage_device(struct device_location *location)
> +{
> + int ret = 0;
> +#ifndef CONFIG_SPL_BUILD
> + /* USB build is not supported yet in SPL */
> + if (!strcmp("usb", location->name))
> + ret = init_usb();
> +#endif
> +
> + if (!strcmp("mmc", location->name))
> + ret = init_mmc();
> +
> + if (!strcmp("sata", location->name))
> + ret = init_storage_sata();
> +
> + if (location->ubivol != NULL)
> + ret = mount_ubifs(location);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static void set_storage_devpart(char *name, char *devpart)
> +{
> + int i;
> + u32 size;
> +
> + size = ARRAY_SIZE(default_locations);
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < size; i++) {
>
The compiler should complain about a comparison of signed and unsigned
integers.
I would do:
size_t i;
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(default_locations); i++) {
[...]
> + if (!strcmp(default_locations[i].name, name))
> + default_locations[i].devpart = devpart;
> + }
> +
> + return;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Prepare firmware struct;
> + * return -ve if fail.
> + */
> +static int _request_firmware_prepare(struct firmware **firmware_p,
> + const char *name, void *dbuf,
> + size_t size, u32 offset)
> +{
> + struct firmware *firmware = NULL;
> + int ret = 0;
> +
> + if (!name || name[0] == '\0')
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> +
Is it really useful to continue here initializing the 'firmware'
struct and returning an error at the end?
> + *firmware_p = firmware = calloc(1, sizeof(*firmware));
> +
> + if (!firmware) {
> + printf("%s: calloc(struct firmware) failed\n", __func__);
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
> +
> + firmware->name = name;
> + firmware->data = dbuf;
> + firmware->size = size;
> + firmware->offset = offset;
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * fw_get_filesystem_firmware - load firmware into a allocated buffer
> + * @firmware_p: pointer to firmware image
> + * @location: An array of supported firmware location
> + *
> + * @return: size of total read
> + * -ve when error
> + */
> +static int fw_get_filesystem_firmware(struct device_location *location,
> + struct firmware *firmware_p)
> +{
> + loff_t actread;
> + char *dev_part;
> + int ret = 0;
> +
Useless initialization.
> + dev_part = env_get("FW_DEV_PART");
> +
> + if (dev_part)
>
Unnecessary blank line.
> + set_storage_devpart(location->name, dev_part);
> +
> + ret = init_storage_device(location);
> +
> + if (ret)
Unnecessary blank line.
> + goto out;
> +
> + select_fs_dev(location);
> +
> + ret = fs_read(firmware_p->name, (u32)firmware_p->data,
>
The second parameter of fs_read is of type 'ulong' NOT 'u32'!
This will blow up when compiling for 64bit machines.
> + firmware_p->offset, firmware_p->size, &actread);
> +
> + if (ret || (actread != firmware_p->size)) {
> + printf("Error: %d Failed to read %s from flash %lld ",
> + ret,
> + firmware_p->name,
> + actread);
> + printf("!= %d.\n", firmware_p->size);
> + return -EPERM;
> + } else
> + ret = actread;
> +
broken indentation.
All clauses of the if/else statement should be enclosed in {}.
> +out:
> + if (location->ubivol != NULL)
> + umount_ubifs();
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +/*
> + * request_firmware_into_buf - load firmware into a previously allocated buffer
> + * @firmware_p: pointer to firmware image
> + * @name: name of firmware file
> + * @buf: address of buffer to load firmware into
> + * @size: size of buffer
> + * @offset: offset of a file for start reading
> + *
> + * This firmware is loaded directly into the buffer pointed to by @buf and
> + * the @firmware_p data member is pointed at @buf.
> + *
> + * @return: size of total read
> + * -ve when error
> + */
> +int request_firmware_into_buf(struct firmware **firmware_p,
> + const char *name,
> + struct device_location *location,
> + void *buf, size_t size, u32 offset)
> +{
> + int ret = 0;
>
Useless initialization.
> + ret = _request_firmware_prepare(firmware_p, name, buf, size, offset);
> +
> + if (ret < 0) /* error */
>
Unnecessary blank line.
> + return ret;
> +
> + ret = fw_get_filesystem_firmware(location, *firmware_p);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> diff --git a/include/fs_loader.h b/include/fs_loader.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..dacc1f3
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/fs_loader.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
> +/*
> + * Copyright (C) 2017 Intel Corporation <www.intel.com>
> + *
> + * SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> + */
> +#ifndef _FS_LOADER_H_
> +#define _FS_LOADER_H_
> +
> +#include <linux/types.h>
> +
> +struct firmware {
> + size_t size; /* Size of a file */
> + const u8 *data; /* Buffer for file */
>
const void *data?
> + const char *name; /* Filename */
> + u32 offset; /* Offset of reading a file */
> + void *priv; /* Firmware loader private fields */
> +};
> +
> +struct device_location {
> + char *name; /* Such as mmc, usb,and sata. */
> + char *devpart; /* Use the load command dev:part conventions */
> + char *mtdpart; /* MTD partition for ubi part */
> + char *ubivol; /* UBI volume-name for ubifsmount */
> +};
> +
> +int request_firmware_into_buf(struct firmware **firmware_p,
> + const char *name,
> + struct device_location *location,
> + void *buf, size_t size, u32 offset);
> +#endif
Lothar Waßmann
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-05 8:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-05 7:57 [U-Boot] [PATCH v5 00/20] Add FPGA driver, SDRAM driver, generic firmware loader and booting U-Boot tien.fong.chee at intel.com
2017-12-05 7:57 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v5 01/20] ARM: socfpga: Description on FPGA RBF properties at Arria 10 FPGA manager tien.fong.chee at intel.com
2017-12-05 7:57 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v5 02/20] dts: Add FPGA bitstream properties to Arria 10 DTS tien.fong.chee at intel.com
2017-12-05 7:57 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v5 03/20] arm: socfpga: Add Arria 10 SoCFPGA programming interface tien.fong.chee at intel.com
2017-12-05 7:57 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v5 04/20] dts: Enable fpga-mgr node build for Arria 10 SPL tien.fong.chee at intel.com
2017-12-05 7:57 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v5 05/20] fs: Enable generic filesystems interface support in SPL tien.fong.chee at intel.com
2017-12-05 7:57 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v5 06/20] arm: socfpga: Remove static declaration on spl_mmc_find_device function tien.fong.chee at intel.com
2017-12-05 7:57 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v5 07/20] common: Generic firmware loader for file system tien.fong.chee at intel.com
2017-12-05 8:53 ` Lothar Waßmann [this message]
2017-12-06 10:06 ` Chee, Tien Fong
2017-12-06 11:00 ` Lothar Waßmann
2017-12-07 5:29 ` Chee, Tien Fong
2017-12-07 7:49 ` Lothar Waßmann
2017-12-07 8:10 ` Chee, Tien Fong
2017-12-07 9:00 ` Lothar Waßmann
2017-12-08 5:25 ` Chee, Tien Fong
2017-12-08 8:22 ` Lothar Waßmann
2017-12-05 7:57 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v5 08/20] arm: socfpga: Fix with the correct polling on bit is set tien.fong.chee at intel.com
2017-12-05 7:57 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v5 09/20] arm: socfpga: Add FPGA drivers for Arria 10 FPGA loadfs tien.fong.chee at intel.com
2017-12-05 7:58 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v5 10/20] arm: socfpga: Rename the gen5 sdram driver to more specific name tien.fong.chee at intel.com
2017-12-05 7:58 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v5 11/20] arm: socfpga: Add DRAM bank size initialization function tien.fong.chee at intel.com
2017-12-05 7:58 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v5 12/20] arm: socfpga: Add DDR driver for Arria 10 tien.fong.chee at intel.com
2017-12-05 7:58 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v5 13/20] configs: Add DDR Kconfig support " tien.fong.chee at intel.com
2017-12-05 7:58 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v5 14/20] arm: socfpga: Enable SPL memory allocation tien.fong.chee at intel.com
2017-12-05 7:58 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v5 15/20] arm: socfpga: Improve comments for Intel SoCFPGA program header tien.fong.chee at intel.com
2017-12-05 7:58 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v5 16/20] arm: socfpga: Enhance Intel SoCFPGA program header to support Arria 10 tien.fong.chee at intel.com
2017-12-05 7:58 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v5 17/20] arm: socfpga: Adding clock frequency info for U-Boot tien.fong.chee at intel.com
2017-12-05 7:58 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v5 18/20] arm: socfpga: Adding SoCFPGA info for both SPL and U-Boot tien.fong.chee at intel.com
2017-12-05 7:58 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v5 19/20] arm: socfpga: Enable DDR working tien.fong.chee at intel.com
2017-12-05 7:58 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v5 20/20] arm: socfpga: Enable SPL booting U-boot tien.fong.chee at intel.com
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171205095301.025ad551@karo-electronics.de \
--to=lw@karo-electronics.de \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox