[U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: imx: cx9020: remove usage of mx53_dram_size

[U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: imx: cx9020: remove usage of mx53_dram_size

[linux-kernel-dev at beckhoff.com]

From: Patrick Bruenn <p.bruenn@beckhoff.com>

Global variables are not available during board_init_f().
'static uint32_t mx53_dram_size[2];' was used in board specific
dram_init(), dram_init_banksize() and get_effective_memsize() to avoid
multiple calls to get_ram_size().

However multiple calls are better than undefined behavior...
This fixes:
https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2017-November/313214.html
https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2017-December/314480.html

Signed-off-by: Patrick Bruenn <p.bruenn@beckhoff.com>

---

mx53cx9020 was based on mx53loco, which still uses this global variable.
If you agree, this is a bug, I can prepare a similar fix for the QSB.
Maybe it makes sense to move the dram_init functions for both boards
into something like boards/freescale/common/mx53_dram.c
But be aware I have no QSB at hand and could only compile test that
patch for mx53loco.

---
 board/beckhoff/mx53cx9020/mx53cx9020.c | 14 +++++---------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/board/beckhoff/mx53cx9020/mx53cx9020.c b/board/beckhoff/mx53cx9020/mx53cx9020.c
index 021bd967c4..d8bdfc27bb 100644
--- a/board/beckhoff/mx53cx9020/mx53cx9020.c
+++ b/board/beckhoff/mx53cx9020/mx53cx9020.c
@@ -59,8 +59,6 @@ static const u32 CCAT_MODE_RUN = 0x0033DC8F;
 
 DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR;
 
-static uint32_t mx53_dram_size[2];
-
 phys_size_t get_effective_memsize(void)
 {
 	/*
@@ -74,15 +72,13 @@ phys_size_t get_effective_memsize(void)
 	 * U-Boot into invalid memory area close to the end of the first
 	 * DRAM bank.
 	 */
-	return mx53_dram_size[0];
+	return get_ram_size((void *)PHYS_SDRAM_1, 1 << 30);
 }
 
 int dram_init(void)
 {
-	mx53_dram_size[0] = get_ram_size((void *)PHYS_SDRAM_1, 1 << 30);
-	mx53_dram_size[1] = get_ram_size((void *)PHYS_SDRAM_2, 1 << 30);
-
-	gd->ram_size = mx53_dram_size[0] + mx53_dram_size[1];
+	gd->ram_size = get_ram_size((void *)PHYS_SDRAM_1, 1 << 30);
+	gd->ram_size += get_ram_size((void *)PHYS_SDRAM_2, 1 << 30);
 
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -90,10 +86,10 @@ int dram_init(void)
 int dram_init_banksize(void)
 {
 	gd->bd->bi_dram[0].start = PHYS_SDRAM_1;
-	gd->bd->bi_dram[0].size = mx53_dram_size[0];
+	gd->bd->bi_dram[0].size = get_ram_size((void *)PHYS_SDRAM_1, 1 << 30);
 
 	gd->bd->bi_dram[1].start = PHYS_SDRAM_2;
-	gd->bd->bi_dram[1].size = mx53_dram_size[1];
+	gd->bd->bi_dram[1].size = get_ram_size((void *)PHYS_SDRAM_2, 1 << 30);
 
 	return 0;
 }
-- 
2.11.0

[U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: imx: cx9020: remove usage of mx53_dram_size

[Lothar Waßmann]

Hi,

On Fri, 15 Dec 2017 13:56:15 +0100 linux-kernel-dev at beckhoff.com wrote:
> From: Patrick Bruenn <p.bruenn@beckhoff.com>
> 
> Global variables are not available during board_init_f().
>
s/Global/static/


Lothar Waßmann

[U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: imx: cx9020: remove usage of mx53_dram_size

[Patrick Brünn]

Hi Lothar,
>From: Lothar Waßmann [mailto:LW at KARO-electronics.de]
>Sent: Freitag, 15. Dezember 2017 15:02
>
>Hi,
>
>On Fri, 15 Dec 2017 13:56:15 +0100 linux-kernel-dev at beckhoff.com wrote:
>> From: Patrick Bruenn <p.bruenn@beckhoff.com>
>>
>> Global variables are not available during board_init_f().
>>
>s/Global/static/
>
I fixed that for v2. Unfortunately everywhere but in the cover letter :-(.

Beckhoff Automation GmbH & Co. KG | Managing Director: Dipl. Phys. Hans Beckhoff
Registered office: Verl, Germany | Register court: Guetersloh HRA 7075

[U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: imx: cx9020: remove usage of mx53_dram_size

[Fabio Estevam]

Hi Patrick,

On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 10:56 AM,  <linux-kernel-dev@beckhoff.com> wrote:
> From: Patrick Bruenn <p.bruenn@beckhoff.com>
>
> Global variables are not available during board_init_f().
> 'static uint32_t mx53_dram_size[2];' was used in board specific
> dram_init(), dram_init_banksize() and get_effective_memsize() to avoid
> multiple calls to get_ram_size().
>
> However multiple calls are better than undefined behavior...
> This fixes:
> https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2017-November/313214.html
> https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2017-December/314480.html
>
> Signed-off-by: Patrick Bruenn <p.bruenn@beckhoff.com>
>
> ---
>
> mx53cx9020 was based on mx53loco, which still uses this global variable.
> If you agree, this is a bug, I can prepare a similar fix for the QSB.
> Maybe it makes sense to move the dram_init functions for both boards
> into something like boards/freescale/common/mx53_dram.c
> But be aware I have no QSB at hand and could only compile test that
> patch for mx53loco.

Yes, it makes sense to fix all boards. board/aries/m53evk/m53evk.c
would also be affected.

Please prepare a patch that fixes all of them.

Thanks!