From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tom Rini Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2017 10:44:59 -0500 Subject: [U-Boot] ARM64 Allwinner Binary Size In-Reply-To: <20171219153613.4u4hqfht4vbujlpr@flea.lan> References: <11d6d712-610b-f972-1d5b-6ab062c07695@arm.com> <20171219131202.dkk4p4m27fv7jvdr@flea.lan> <7fea3496-99a5-cb94-256b-9b518d8be892@arm.com> <20171219142029.l7nqhcdy3hmj63ix@flea.lan> <20171219153613.4u4hqfht4vbujlpr@flea.lan> Message-ID: <20171219154459.GH14220@bill-the-cat> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 04:36:13PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote: > On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 02:27:57PM +0000, Andre Przywara wrote: > > >>> Removing those options make the u-boot.itb binary size going from > > >>> 516kB to 478kB, making it functional again *and* allowing us to enable > > >>> the DT overlays that seem way more important than any feature > > >>> mentionned above (and bumps the size to 483kB). > > >> > > >> How important is the raw MMC environment for the ARM64 boards, actually? > > >> Most of the rationale for the 32-bit side seemed to apply to legacy use > > >> cases only. Do we have reports/complaints from 64-bit users? > > > > > > Pretty much as important as it is on arm I guess. We just have less > > > history, but the same use cases. > > > > > > I'd really like to give at least one release for transition, which > > > would mean having a schedule like this: > > > > > > - in 2018.01, merge those config removals so that we have least have > > > something that works quite fast > > So, given the various feedback, the current diff for the pine64 is: > http://code.bulix.org/t7icrw-243561 > > With that, We're at 500kB with the ATF. > > Does it work for everyone here? Works for me, thanks! -- Tom -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: not available URL: