[U-Boot] [PATCH v6 2/2] common: Generic firmware loader for file system

["Lothar Waßmann" <LW@KARO-electronics.de>]

Hi,

On Mon, 22 Jan 2018 07:11:37 +0000 Chee, Tien Fong wrote:
> On Thu, 2018-01-18 at 12:12 +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > On 01/18/2018 05:33 AM, Chee, Tien Fong wrote:
> > > 
> > > On Tue, 2018-01-16 at 15:41 +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > On 12/27/2017 06:04 AM, tien.fong.chee at intel.com wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > Whoa, this improved substantially since last time I checked.
> > > > Minor
> > > > nitpicks below.
> > > > 
> > > > [...]
> > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > +/* USB build is not supported yet in SPL */
> > > > > +#ifndef CONFIG_SPL_BUILD
> > > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_USB_STORAGE
> > > > > +static int init_usb(void)
> > > > > +{
> > > > > +	int err;
> > > > > +
> > > > > +	err = usb_init();
> > > > > +	if (err)
> > > > > +		return err;
> > > > > +
> > > > > +#ifndef CONFIG_DM_USB
> > > > > +	err = usb_stor_scan(1) < 0 ? -ENODEV : 0;
> > > > if (err)
> > > > 	return err;
> > > > ?
> > > > 
> > > This is last line code of the function, so it's always return the
> > > result regardless error or not.
> > You are rewriting the true error code with -ENODEV instead of
> > propagating it.
> > 
> Ohh....are you saying to change the codes as shown in below:
> 
> err = usb_stor_scan(1);
> if (err)
> return err;
> 
usb_stor_scan() does not return a sensible error code, but '-1' if no
device was found. This should be changed to -ENODEV then!


Lothar Waßmann