From: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] watchdog: omap_wdt: improve watchdog reset path
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2018 09:33:21 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180301143321.GN4311@bill-the-cat> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAB=otbRUoAGAUsCbWMZpgDs=uu3=GUXOjxkM6-qDGtiz7dBAqg@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 04:10:44PM +0200, Ruslan Bilovol wrote:
> Hi Lukasz,
>
> On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 12:53 PM, Lukasz Majewski <lukma@denx.de> wrote:
> > Hi Ruslan,
> >
> >> Remove busy looping during watchdog reset.
> >> Each polling of W_PEND_WTGR bit ("finish posted
> >> write") after watchdog reset takes 120-140us
> >> on BeagleBone Black board. Current U-Boot code
> >> has watchdog resets in random places and often
> >> there is situation when watchdog is reset
> >> few times in a row in nested functions.
> >> This adds extra delays and slows the whole system.
> >>
> >> Instead of polling W_PEND_WTGR bit, we skip
> >> watchdog reset if the bit is set. Anyway, watchdog
> >> is in the middle of reset *right now*, so we can
> >> just return.
> >
> > It seems like similar problem may be in the Linux kernel driver:
> > v4.16-rc1/source/drivers/watchdog/omap_wdt.c#L74
> >
> > Linux driver also waits for the write.
>
> Right, Linux driver has similar code but it doesn't affect performance.
> This is because of watchdog usage in Linux, it is enabled and
> reset by userspace. This is quite rare event.
> Moreover, since Linux has interrupts enabled and has scheduling,
> such busy loops in the omap driver are not very different to
> just mdelay() usage. The system can handle interrupts, and can
> even do preemption if PREEMPT is enabled.
> So use of such busy loops in that particular case shouldn't cause
> any noticeable performance issues.
True. But, can you also submit a patch to the kernel side (and CC me) ?
That's far more likely to get the attention of the engineers that might
know of corner cases with the various SoC families where we might need
to keep doing what we're doing or other possible problems. Thanks!
--
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20180301/1aa8f790/attachment.sig>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-01 14:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-01 1:15 [U-Boot] [PATCH] watchdog: omap_wdt: improve watchdog reset path Ruslan Bilovol
2018-03-01 10:53 ` Lukasz Majewski
2018-03-01 14:10 ` Ruslan Bilovol
2018-03-01 14:33 ` Tom Rini [this message]
2018-03-02 17:34 ` Sam Protsenko
2018-03-04 14:00 ` Ruslan Bilovol
2018-03-05 14:40 ` Tom Rini
2018-03-02 14:20 ` Lukasz Majewski
2018-03-01 14:29 ` Sam Protsenko
2018-03-02 9:13 ` Lokesh Vutla
2018-03-16 7:39 ` Alex Kiernan
2018-03-16 13:50 ` [U-Boot] " Tom Rini
[not found] <mailman.1.1520078401.9391.u-boot@lists.denx.de>
2018-03-05 16:00 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH] " Jonathan Cormer
2018-03-05 20:45 ` Ruslan Bilovol
2018-03-05 22:39 ` Jon Cormier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180301143321.GN4311@bill-the-cat \
--to=trini@konsulko.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox