From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Miquel Raynal Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2018 08:53:40 +0100 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 00/18] Introduce SPI TPM v2.0 support In-Reply-To: <20180308172030.GA1770@bill-the-cat.ec.rr.com> References: <20180308154021.25255-1-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> <20180308172030.GA1770@bill-the-cat.ec.rr.com> Message-ID: <20180309085340.32cf1730@xps13> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Hi Tom, On Thu, 8 Mar 2018 12:20:30 -0500, Tom Rini wrote: > On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 04:40:03PM +0100, Miquel Raynal wrote: >=20 > > Current U-Boot supports TPM v1.2 specification. The new specification > > (v2.0) is not backward compatible and renames/introduces several > > functions. > >=20 > > This series introduces a new SPI driver following the TPM v2.0 > > specification. It has been tested on a ST TPM but should be usable with > > others v2.0 compliant chips. > >=20 > > Then, basic functionalities are introduced one by one for the v2.0 > > specification. The INIT command now can receive a parameter to > > distinguish further TPMv1/TPMv2 commands. After that, the library itself > > will know which one is pertinent and will return a special error if the > > desired command is not supported for the selected specification. =20 >=20 > Thanks for doing all of this. Can you please enable this feature on > sandbox and/or an x86 QEMU variant where I assume we could also then > setup automated testing? >=20 Not sure I understand your request correctly: the TPM commands are already available in the sandbox (I don't see what I could add), I just extended the current set of commands. However, even with these commands, we won't be able to test them in a sandbox unless with an actual device. I probably miss something, can you explain a bit more what you would like? Thank you, Miqu=C3=A8l --=20 Miquel Raynal, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons) Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com