From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Maxime Ripard Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2018 19:07:23 +0200 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 02/13] sunxi: add basical memory map definitions of H6 SoC In-Reply-To: References: <20180625103723.24760-1-icenowy@aosc.io> <20180625103723.24760-3-icenowy@aosc.io> <20180625123334.vbr2dk6jpzfj3xha@flea> Message-ID: <20180625170723.sbmrb2cvsuofq2ul@flea> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 08:50:08PM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote: > > > 于 2018年6月25日 GMT+08:00 下午8:33:34, Maxime Ripard 写到: > >On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 06:37:12PM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote: > >> The Allwinner H6 SoC come with a totally new memory map. > >> > >> Add basical definition of the new memory map into a header file, and > >let > >> the cpu.h header include it in the situation of H6. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Icenowy Zheng > >> --- > >> arch/arm/include/asm/arch-sunxi/cpu.h | 2 + > >> .../include/asm/arch-sunxi/cpu_sun50i_h6.h | 73 > >+++++++++++++++++++ > >> 2 files changed, 75 insertions(+) > >> create mode 100644 arch/arm/include/asm/arch-sunxi/cpu_sun50i_h6.h > >> > >> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-sunxi/cpu.h > >b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-sunxi/cpu.h > >> index caec865264..08be963e8e 100644 > >> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-sunxi/cpu.h > >> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-sunxi/cpu.h > >> @@ -9,6 +9,8 @@ > >> > >> #if defined(CONFIG_MACH_SUN9I) > >> #include > >> +#elif defined(CONFIG_MACH_SUN50I_H6) > >> +#include > >> #else > >> #include > >> #endif > >> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-sunxi/cpu_sun50i_h6.h > >b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-sunxi/cpu_sun50i_h6.h > >> new file mode 100644 > >> index 0000000000..b12f2dd1a2 > >> --- /dev/null > >> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-sunxi/cpu_sun50i_h6.h > >> @@ -0,0 +1,73 @@ > >> +/* > >> + * (C) Copyright 2017 Icenowy Zheng > >> + * > >> + * SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+ > >> + */ > >> + > >> +#ifndef _SUNXI_CPU_SUN50I_H6_H > >> +#define _SUNXI_CPU_SUN50I_H6_H > >> + > >> +#define SUNXI_SRAM_A1_BASE 0x00020000 > > > >Isn't that the same thing than SUNXI_SRAM_ADDRESS? Having it defined > >twice and expecting the value to be matching seems a bit weird. > > This assumes SPL will be in SRAM A1, which may change. Then let's deal with this when it will change. Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons) Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: not available URL: